Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reproductive coercion and abuse among pregnancy counselling clients in Australia: trends and directions.
Sheeran, Nicola; Vallury, Kari; Sharman, Leah S; Corbin, Bonney; Douglas, Heather; Bernardino, Brenna; Hach, Maria; Coombe, Leanne; Keramidopoulos, Sophie; Torres-Quiazon, Regina; Tarzia, Laura.
Afiliação
  • Sheeran N; School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt Campus, 176 Messines ridge road, Mt Gravatt, Brisbane, Australia. n.sheeran@griffith.edu.au.
  • Vallury K; Children by Choice, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Sharman LS; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Corbin B; Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Douglas H; Marie Stopes Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Bernardino B; Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Hach M; Marie Stopes Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Coombe L; Multicultural Centre for Women's Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Keramidopoulos S; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Torres-Quiazon R; Marie Stopes Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Tarzia L; Multicultural Centre for Women's Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Reprod Health ; 19(1): 170, 2022 Jul 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35907880
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) interferes with a person's reproductive autonomy and can be classified into behaviours that are pregnancy promoting or pregnancy preventing (including coerced abortion). However, prevalence data are lacking, and little is known about whether particular forms of RCA are more or less common. The aims of our study were to explore how frequently people seeking pregnancy counselling reported RCA, the proportions reporting the different forms of RCA, and whether there were different trends based on a range of demographic factors.

METHODS:

Data were collected from 5107 clients seeking counselling support for their pregnancy between January 2018 and December 2020 from two leading providers of pregnancy counselling and sexual and reproductive health services in Australia, Marie Stopes Australia and Children by Choice. Counsellors identified and recorded the presence of RCA and whether the behaviour was pregnancy promoting and/or pregnancy preventing. Demographic factors included age, and whether the person identified as being from a migrant or refugee community or as an Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person.

RESULTS:

RCA was identified in 15.4% of clients, with similar proportions disclosing RCA towards pregnancy (6%) and towards pregnancy prevention or abortion (7.5%), and 1.9% experiencing RCA towards pregnancy and abortion concurrently. There were no differences based on age or whether the person identified as being from a migrant or refugee background, though people who identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander experienced RCA that was significantly more likely to be pregnancy promoting.

CONCLUSIONS:

RCA is commonly disclosed by people seeking support in a pregnancy counselling context, and coercion and abuse is equally likely to be towards pregnancy promotion or pregnancy prevention/abortion. Given the prevalence and negative impacts of RCA, regardless of age and background, we recommend sensitive and culturally respectful enquiry around experiences of RCA be embedded in healthcare, health education, and health research.
Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is behaviour that interferes with a person's decision to become pregnant or to continue a pregnancy. We classified RCA into behaviours that attempt to promote pregnancy or to prevent/end a pregnancy. Drawing on data collected from 5107 people seeking counselling support for their pregnancy from two Australian services, this research explored how common the different types of RCA are. The research also looked at whether a person's age or whether the person identified as being from a migrant or refugee community or as an Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person made any difference to the type of RCA they experienced. We found that 15.4% of people reported RCA, with similar proportions reporting behaviours attempting to promote pregnancy and prevent/end pregnancy. Around 2% reported experiencing both forms of RCA. We found that there were no differences in frequency of RCA based on age or whether the person identified as being from a migrant or refugee background, although we found that people who identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander were proportionally more likely to experience RCA that was pregnancy promoting. Given how common RCA is, regardless of age and background, we recommend sensitive and culturally respectful enquiry around experiences of RCA be included in any conversations around sexual and reproductive health care and education.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Maus-Tratos Infantis / Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Maus-Tratos Infantis / Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article