Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"Shift and cover technique": conservative management of complications for the rescue of S-ICD subcutaneous implantable defibrillator systems.
Droghetti, Andrea; Pecora, Domenico; Maffè, Stefano; Badolati, Sandra; Pepi, Patrizia; Nicolis, Daniele; Lupo, Pierpaolo; Lovecchio, Mariolina; Valsecchi, Sergio; Ottaviano, Luca.
Afiliação
  • Droghetti A; Thoracic Surgery Division, ASST Mantova, Viale Lago Paiolo 10, 46100, Mantua, Italy. adroghetti@libero.it.
  • Pecora D; Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiovascular Department, Poliambulanza Institute Hospital Foundation, Brescia, Italy.
  • Maffè S; Division of Cardiology, Ospedale SS, Trinità, Borgomanero Hospital, Novara, Italy.
  • Badolati S; Department of Cardiology, S. Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy.
  • Pepi P; Cardiology Division, ASST Mantova, Mantua, Italy.
  • Nicolis D; Cardiology Division, ASST Mantova, Mantua, Italy.
  • Lupo P; Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Center,I.R.C.C.S. MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni (MI), Italy.
  • Lovecchio M; Boston Scientific, Milan, Italy.
  • Valsecchi S; Boston Scientific, Milan, Italy.
  • Ottaviano L; Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology unit, Cardiothoracic Department Clinical Institute S. Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35927601
BACKGROUND: The risk of complications has been shown to be lower with subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD) than with conventional ICDs. Given the low frequency of complications, experience of how to manage them is limited. In this paper, we describe generator- and lead-related complications recorded in a series of S-ICD patients, and we propose our conservative approach to managing them. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of S-ICD patients who were referred to our institution owing to generator- or lead-related complications requiring surgical intervention. With our "shift and cover" approach, the system component involved is moved from its original position to an alternative, more protected location. In the case of the generator, this involves moving it to an intermuscular pocket. In the case of infections at the parasternal scar, the electrode sleeve is moved away from its original location, stitched, and then covered with the muscular fascia. RESULTS: Fourteen S-ICD patients were referred to our institution owing to system-related complications. Complications involved the generator in 7 cases (deep pocket infections with erosion, extrusion, or pain), the lead in 5 cases (parasternal infections at the xyphoid incision site), and both the generator and the lead in 2 cases. Complications were managed without completely removing the device and resolved in a single surgical session with no intraoperative complications. During defibrillation testing, the first shock at 65 J was effective in all patients. The shock impedance after revision was significantly lower than that measured during first implantation (59 ± 10 Ohm versus 86 ± 24 Ohm, P = 0.013). In all cases, the cosmetic result was satisfactory. No complications or recurrent infections were reported at the 12-month follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed conservative approach was successful in managing S-ICD complications. The revision procedure allowed to optimize the system configuration in terms of the defibrillation vector, resulting in lower shock impedance values and better device positioning.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article