Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of sample preparation methods for suspect and non-target screening in water, sediment, and biota samples using gas chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry.
Sim, Wonjin; Choi, Sol; Lee, Heon-Jun; Kim, Kyungtae; Park, Kyunghwa; Oh, Jeong-Eun.
Afiliação
  • Sim W; Institute for Environment and Energy, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: onejiny@pusan.ac.kr.
  • Choi S; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee HJ; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim K; National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: pooh7231@korea.kr.
  • Park K; National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: mirrorpark@korea.kr.
  • Oh JE; Institute for Environment and Energy, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jeoh@pusan.ac.kr.
Sci Total Environ ; 849: 157835, 2022 Nov 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35934023
In this study, the sample preparation methods were proposed for the suspect and non-target screening (SNTS) using gas chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry in the aquatic environment. The pretreatment methods were evaluated based on detection rates, recoveries, and screening detection limits (SDLs) for 316 substances spiked into surface water, sediment, and biota samples. The detection rates of the spiked compounds were 92.1 % and 98.7 % by the sample preparation methods for water (solid-phase extraction using HLB cartridge) and sediment (ultrasonic extraction (USE) with HLB cartridge clean-up), respectively. Similarly, USE with HLB cartridge clean-up gave the highest detection rate (87.9 %) for biota samples; however, additional pretreatment method using deactivated silica gel clean-up was necessary for the detection of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). The SDL ranges of spiked compounds by the suggested pretreatment methods were 0.01-23.5 ng/L for surface water, 0.02-37.5 ng/g dry weight for sediment, and 0.01-12.2 ng/g wet weight for biota. Although some pollutants, such as POPs had SDLs that were higher than the levels normally detected in the aquatic environment as reported in previous studies, the analytical methods suggested in the present study were satisfactory for the SNTS of most pollutants originated from anthropogenic sources.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Químicos da Água / Poluentes Ambientais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Químicos da Água / Poluentes Ambientais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article