Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy Timing Predicts Hand-Offs but Not Miscounts.
Vaysburg, Dennis M; Delman, Aaron M; Turner, Kevin M; Salvator, Ann; Frasier, Lane L.
Afiliação
  • Vaysburg DM; Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Research on Education in Surgical Training (CREST), Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Delman AM; Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Research on Education in Surgical Training (CREST), Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Turner KM; Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Research on Education in Surgical Training (CREST), Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Salvator A; Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Research on Education in Surgical Training (CREST), Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Frasier LL; Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Research on Education in Surgical Training (CREST), Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: frasiele@ucmail.uc.edu.
J Surg Res ; 280: 55-62, 2022 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35963015
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Intraoperative hand-offs are poorly coordinated and associated with risk of surgical miscount. We evaluated hand-off patterns for nursing staff during two common operations hypothesizing that hand-off patterns would be associated with increased surgical miscounts and vary during operations performed standard versus nonstandard operating hours.

METHODS:

We retrospectively analyzed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (N = 3888) and appendectomy (N = 1768) from 2012 to 2021 at a single institution using electronic medical records. We evaluated intraoperative hand-off patterns and the presence of miscounts for operations performed during standard versus nonstandard hours. Standard operating hours were defined as M-F 730 am to 500 pm.

RESULTS:

Across 5656 operations, 10 cases had surgical miscounts and were significantly longer than those without (156.5 versus 101 min P = 0.0178). More than half (51.3%) of cases had no identified hand-offs, and 42.9% of cases occurred during nonstandard hours. Cases during standard versus nonstandard hours were more likely to have hand-offs (56.0% versus 38.9%), P < 0.0001 and had shorter interval between hand-offs (64 versus 75 min), P < 0.0001. The period between patient entry to the room and intubation, which includes initial counts, had a disproportionately high percentage of hand-offs (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Variability in hand-off occurrence and frequency in operations performed during standard and nonstandard hours suggest that hand-offs are influenced by staffing patterns. Few surgical miscounts occurred but were associated with longer cases. Hand-offs disproportionately occurred between patient entry and intubation, with a potential for disruption of initial instrument counts. Future work optimizing hand-off coordination is an opportunity to mitigate risk to patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apendicectomia / Colecistectomia Laparoscópica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apendicectomia / Colecistectomia Laparoscópica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article