Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endotyping of Cholesteatoma: Which Molecular Biomarkers? A Systematic Review.
Cantone, Elena; Di Nola, Claudio; De Corso, Eugenio; Cavaliere, Michele; Grimaldi, Giusi; Fetoni, Anna Rita; Motta, Gaetano.
Afiliação
  • Cantone E; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences-ENT Section, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
  • Di Nola C; Head and Neck Department-ENT Section, AOU Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
  • De Corso E; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences-ENT Section, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
  • Cavaliere M; Head and Neck Department-ENT Section, AOU Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
  • Grimaldi G; Head and Neck Surgery-Otorhinolaryngology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
  • Fetoni AR; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences-ENT Section, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
  • Motta G; Head and Neck Department-ENT Section, AOU Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
J Pers Med ; 12(8)2022 Aug 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36013295
BACKGROUND: So far, no medical treatment is available for cholesteatoma (C) and the only effective therapy is complete surgical removal, but recurrence is common even after surgical treatment. While C is classically divided into two clinical phenotypes, congenital and acquired, only a few studies have focused on its potential biomarkers. This study aims to revise the literature to identify which biomarkers can define the endotype of C. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) process to identify published experimental articles about molecular biomarkers in C. RESULTS: KGF and its receptor, MMP-9, KRT-1, KRT-10, and MIF might be considered biomarkers of recurrence, whereas Ki-67, TLR-4, RANKL, IL17, MMP-2, MMP-9, IL6, TNF-α, should be considered more specifically as biomarkers of bony erosion. CONCLUSIONS: These results are interesting especially from a prognostic point of view, nevertheless more studies are needed to search new biomarkers of C that could completely change not only the therapeutic standards of the disease, but also the clinical history of C itself in the era of precision medicine.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article