Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating fomite risk of brown paper bags storing personal protective equipment exposed to SARS-CoV-2: A quasi-experimental study.
Unger, Kyirsty; Dietz, Leslie; Horve, Patrick; Van Den Wymelenberg, Kevin; Lin, Amber; Kinney, Erin; Kea, Bory.
Afiliação
  • Unger K; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
  • Dietz L; University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
  • Horve P; University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
  • Van Den Wymelenberg K; University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
  • Lin A; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
  • Kinney E; School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
  • Kea B; Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Policy and Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0273433, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36026512
INTRODUCTION: Literature is lacking on the safety of storing contaminated PPE in paper bags for reuse, potentially increasing exposure to frontline healthcare workers (HCW) and patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of paper bags as a barrier for fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by storing face masks, respirators, and face shields. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study evaluated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 on the interior and exterior surfaces of paper bags containing PPE that had aerosolized exposures in clinical and simulated settings. Between May and October 2020, 30 unique PPE items were collected from COVID-19 units at two urban hospitals. Exposed PPE, worn by either an infected patient or HCW during a SARS-CoV-2 aerosolizing event, were placed into an unused paper bag. Samples were tested at 30-minute and 12-hour intervals. RESULTS: A total of 177 swabs were processed from 30 PPE samples. We found a 6.8% positivity rate among all samples across both collection sites. Highest positivity rates were associated with ventilator disconnection and exposure to respiratory droplets from coughing. Positivity rates differed between hospital units. Total positivity rates were similar between 30-minute (6.7%) and 12-hour (6.9%) sample testing time intervals. Control samples exposed to inactivated SARS-CoV-2 droplets had higher total viral counts than samples exposed to nebulized aerosols. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggests paper bags are not a significant fomite risk for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. However, controls demonstrated a risk with droplet exposure. Data can inform guidelines for storing and re-using PPE in situations of limited supplies during future pandemics.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equipamento de Proteção Individual / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equipamento de Proteção Individual / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article