Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A scoring model for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion.
Wu, Senquan; Li, Shaomei; Fang, Nianxin; Mo, Weiliang; Wang, Huadong; Zhang, Ping.
Afiliação
  • Wu S; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dongguan People's Hospital, 78 Wandao Road South, Dongguan, 523059, Guangdong, China. 873508640@qq.com.
  • Li S; Department of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People's Republic of China, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, Guangdong, China. 873508640@qq.com.
  • Fang N; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dongguan People's Hospital, 78 Wandao Road South, Dongguan, 523059, Guangdong, China.
  • Mo W; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dongguan People's Hospital, 78 Wandao Road South, Dongguan, 523059, Guangdong, China.
  • Wang H; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dongguan People's Hospital, 78 Wandao Road South, Dongguan, 523059, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhang P; Department of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People's Republic of China, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, Guangdong, China. owanghd@jnu.edu.cn.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 332, 2022 Sep 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36056429
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Due to the low efficiency of a single clinical feature or laboratory variable in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TBPE), the diagnosis of TBPE is still challenging. This study aimed to build a scoring diagnostic model based on laboratory variables and clinical features to differentiate TBPE from non-tuberculous pleural effusion (non-TBPE).

METHODS:

A retrospective study of 125 patients (63 with TBPE; 62 with non-TBPE) was undertaken. Univariate analysis was used to select the laboratory and clinical variables relevant to the model composition. The statistically different variables were selected to undergo binary logistic regression. Variables B coefficients were used to define a numerical score to calculate a scoring model. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the best cut-off value and evaluate the performance of the model. Finally, we add a validation cohort to verify the model.

RESULTS:

Six variables were selected in the scoring model Age ≤ 46 years old (4.96 points), Male (2.44 points), No cancer (3.19 points), Positive T-cell Spot (T-SPOT) results (4.69 points), Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) ≥ 24.5U/L (2.48 point), C-reactive Protein (CRP) ≥ 52.8 mg/L (1.84 points). With a cut-off value of a total score of 11.038 points, the scoring model's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 93.7%, 96.8%, and 99.2%, respectively. And the validation cohort confirms the model with the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.9%, 93.3%, and 93.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The scoring model can be used in differentiating TBPE from non-TBPE.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derrame Pleural / Tuberculose / Tuberculose Pleural Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derrame Pleural / Tuberculose / Tuberculose Pleural Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article