In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from ICU patients in Spain and Portugal (SUPERIOR and STEP studies).

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To study the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam and comparators and the imipenem/relebactam resistance mechanisms in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa collection from Portugal (STEP, 2017-18) and Spain (SUPERIOR, 2016-17) surveillance studies. METHODS: P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 474) were prospectively recovered from complicated urinary tract (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal (cIAI) and lower respiratory tract (LRTI) infections in 11 Portuguese and 8 Spanish ICUs. MICs were determined (ISO broth microdilution). All imipenem/relebactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 30) and a subset of imipenem/relebactam-susceptible strains (n = 32) were characterized by WGS. RESULTS: Imipenem/relebactam (93.7% susceptible), ceftazidime/avibactam (93.5% susceptible) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (93.2% susceptible) displayed comparable activity. The imipenem/relebactam resistance rate was 6.3% (Portugal 5.8%; Spain 8.9%). Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility to 76.9% (103/134) of imipenem-resistant isolates, including MDR (82.1%; 32/39), XDR (68.8%; 53/77) and difficult-to-treat (DTR) isolates (67.2%; 45/67). Among sequenced strains, differences in population structure were detected depending on the country clonal complex (CC)175 and CC309 in Spain and CC235, CC244, CC348 and CC253 in Portugal. Different carbapenemase gene distributions were also found VIM-20 (n = 3), VIM-1 (n = 2), VIM-2 (n = 1) and VIM-36 (n = 1) in Spain and GES-13 (n = 13), VIM-2 (n = 3) and KPC-3 (n = 2) in Portugal. GES-13-CC235 (n = 13) and VIM type-CC175 (n = 5) associations were predominant in Portugal and Spain, respectively. Imipenem/relebactam showed activity against KPC-3 strains (2/2), but was inactive against all GES-13 producers and most of the VIM producers (8/10). Mutations in genes affecting porin inactivation, efflux pump overexpression and LPS modification might also be involved in imipenem/relebactam resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Microbiological results reinforce imipenem/relebactam as a potential option to treat cUTI, cIAI and LRTI caused by MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa isolates, except for GES-13 and VIM producers.