Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Participant-Level Analysis of the Effects of Interventions on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability.
Powden, Cameron J; Koldenhoven, Rachel M; Simon, Janet E; Fraser, John J; Rosen, Adam B; Jaffri, Abbis; Mitchell, Andrew B; Burcal, Christopher J.
Afiliação
  • Powden CJ; Department of Athletic Training, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN,USA.
  • Koldenhoven RM; Department of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX,USA.
  • Simon JE; College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, OH,USA.
  • Fraser JJ; Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA,USA.
  • Rosen AB; School of Health and Kinesiology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE,USA.
  • Jaffri A; School of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions, Creighton University, Omaha, NE,USA.
  • Mitchell AB; School of Sport Science and Physical Activity, University of Bedfordshire, Luton,United Kingdom.
  • Burcal CJ; School of Health and Kinesiology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE,USA.
J Sport Rehabil ; 32(2): 124-132, 2023 Feb 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36096479
CONTEXT: Intervention studies for chronic ankle instability (CAI) often focus on improving physical impairments of the ankle complex. However, using an impairments-focused approach may miss psychological factors that may mediate function and recovery. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures can be used to assess several dimensions of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and deliver enhanced patient-centered care. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to evaluate group-level improvements in HRQoL and treatment response rates following various interventions in patients with CAI. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: Data from 7 previous studies were pooled by the chronic ankle instability outcomes network for participant-level analysis, resulting in 136 patients with CAI. Several interventions were assessed including balance training, gait biofeedback, joint mobilizations, stretching, and strengthening, with treatment volume ranging from 1 to 4 weeks. Outcome measures were PROs that assessed ankle-specific function (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure), injury-related fear (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire), and global well-being (Disablement in the Physically Active); the PROs assessed varied between studies. Preintervention to postintervention changes were evaluated using separate Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and effect sizes, and a responder analysis was conducted for each PRO. RESULTS: Significant, moderate to large improvements were observed in PROs that assessed ankle-specific function, injury-related fear, and global well-being following intervention (P < .001). Responder rates ranged from 39.0% to 53.3%, 12.8% to 51.4%, and 37.8% for ankle specific function, injury-related fear, and global well-being, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Various interventions can lead to positive improvements in HRQoL in patients with CAI. Treatment response rates at improving HRQoL are similar to response rates at improving impairments such as balance, further reinforcing the need for individualized treatment approaches when treating a patient with CAI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instabilidade Articular / Tornozelo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instabilidade Articular / Tornozelo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article