Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Human amniotic membrane products for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. do they help? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mohammed, Yasmine Adel; Farouk, Hossam Khaled; Gbreel, Mohamed Ibrahim; Ali, Abdelrahman Mahmoud; Salah, Ali Ashraf; Nourelden, Anas Zakarya; Gawad, Mohamed Mahmoud Abd-El.
Afiliação
  • Mohammed YA; Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71631, Assiut governorate, Egypt. yasminea126@gmail.com.
  • Farouk HK; International Medical Research Association (IMedRA), Cairo, Egypt. yasminea126@gmail.com.
  • Gbreel MI; International Medical Research Association (IMedRA), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Ali AM; Faculty of Medicine, Al-Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
  • Salah AA; International Medical Research Association (IMedRA), Cairo, Egypt.
  • Nourelden AZ; Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt.
  • Gawad MMA; International Medical Research Association (IMedRA), Cairo, Egypt.
J Foot Ankle Res ; 15(1): 71, 2022 Sep 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36104736
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most serious diabetic complications. DFU is an open wound that usually occurs in the foot sole due to poor blood glucose control, peripheral neuropathy, and poor circulation. The human amniotic allograft membrane is a biological wound dressing derived from the amniotic membrane. It contains amino acids, nutrients, cytokines, and growth factors that make the growth process easier.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (DHACA) plus the standard of wound care (SOC) with the SOC alone.

METHODS:

We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science till April 2021 using relevant keywords. All search results were screened for eligibility. We extracted the data from the included trials and pooled them as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) using Review Manager software (ver. 5.4).

RESULTS:

The pooled effect estimate from 11 RCTs showed that DHACA was superior to SOC regarding the complete wound healing in both 6th and 12th week (RR = 3.78; 95% CI [2.51, 5.70]; P < 0.00001) and (RR = 2.00; 95% CI [1.67, 2.39], P < 0.00001 respectively). Also, the analysis favored the DHACA regarding the mean time to heal in the 12th-week (MD = -12.07, 95%CI [-19.23, -4.91], P = 0.001). The wound size reduction was better with DHACA (MD = 1.18, 95%CI [-0,10, 2.26], P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION:

Using DHACA with SOC is safer and more effective than using SOC alone for DFU patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pé Diabético / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pé Diabético / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article