Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-dose adjuvant dexmedetomidine did not decrease propofol sedation requirements in children undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Johnson, Eric G; Weaver, Sarah G; Batt, Kelsey L; Weaver, Robert H; Schadler, Aric; Hall, Sarah J.
Afiliação
  • Johnson EG; Department of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Weaver SG; University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Batt KL; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Weaver RH; Department of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Schadler A; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Hall SJ; University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Pharmacotherapy ; 42(10): 792-797, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36106427
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Propofol is the cornerstone of deep sedation during pediatric esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), though adjuvant dexmedetomidine may provide propofol-sparing benefits.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether adjuvant dexmedetomidine decreases the total propofol dose in pediatric patients undergoing EGD.

METHODS:

This single-center, retrospective, cohort study evaluated the total propofol dose in pediatric patients undergoing EGD with and without the use of adjuvant dexmedetomidine. Secondary outcomes included the change in hemodynamics across the perioperative continuum and post-procedure recovery time. A multivariable general linear regression was performed to identify associated variables for recovery time post-procedure.

RESULTS:

A total of 159 patients were included in the study; 88 patients received dexmedetomidine and propofol (DEX-PRO), and 71 patients received propofol only (PRO). The median [interquartile range (IQR)] propofol dose in the DEX-PRO group was 0.26 [IQR, 0.17-0.36] mg kg-1  min-1 which was not significantly different than the PRO group at 0.27 [IQR, 0.21-0.34] mg kg-1  min-1 , p = 0.730. Evaluation of secondary end points showed the DEX-PRO group had more cases of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) hypotension (61% vs. 34%, p = 0.001) and a longer recovery time (32.9 ± 14.1 vs. 25.6 ± 10.8 min, p < 0.001) versus the PRO group, respectively. Multivariable linear regression demonstrated that age and the use of dexmedetomidine were associated with prolonged recovery.

CONCLUSION:

Adjuvant dexmedetomidine did not reduce propofol requirements compared with propofol alone in pediatric patients undergoing EGD. More hypotension and a longer postoperative recovery time were also seen in patients receiving adjuvant dexmedetomidine for their endoscopic procedure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Dexmedetomidina / Hipotensão / Anestesia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Dexmedetomidina / Hipotensão / Anestesia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article