Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multi-center study of residual gastric volume and bowel preparation after the usage of 1L and 2L polyethylene glycol in Korea.
Park, Yong Eun; Jeong, Su Jin; Lee, Jin; Park, Jongha; Yu, Seung Jung; Jee, Sam Ryong; Kim, Tae Oh.
Afiliação
  • Park YE; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  • Jeong SJ; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee J; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  • Park J; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  • Yu SJ; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  • Jee SR; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim TO; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(38): e30795, 2022 Sep 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36197218
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In colonoscopy, good bowel preparation is an important factor in determining the quality of colonoscopy. However, an increase in residual gastric volume (RGV) can lead to a higher risk of aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the factors related to an increase in RGV with the usage of 1L polyethylene glycol (PEG).

METHODS:

We prospectively analyzed 268 patients who underwent both gastroscopy and colonoscopy at 2 hospitals from May to October 2021. Bowel preparation was performed using 1L in 127 patients (47.4%) and 2L PEG in 141 patients (52.6%). We investigated the time taken for bowel preparation solutions, the last water intake, total water intake, and RGV, and conducted a survey on taking compliance and satisfaction.

RESULTS:

The level of RGV was significantly increased in the 1L PEG group when compared to the 2L PEG group (1L, 52.26 ±â€…65.33 vs 2L, 23.55 ±â€…22.99; P < .001). There was no difference between the 2 groups in the degree of bowel preparation, but there were more bubbles formed in the 1L group (1L, 1.91 ±â€…2.74 vs 2L, 1.10 ±â€…2.02; P = .007). In the case of RGV ≥ 50 mL, in multivariate analysis, the risk was higher in water intake within 5 hours and the patients who think the dose is too high (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION:

Therefore, since RGV is higher in 1L PEG than in 2L PEG, it is necessary to be careful not to take water for at least 5 hours before the test.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Polietilenoglicóis / Catárticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Polietilenoglicóis / Catárticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article