Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-centered dosing: oncologists' perspectives about treatment-related side effects and individualized dosing for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
Loeser, Anne L; Gao, Lucy; Bardia, Aditya; Burkard, Mark E; Kalinsky, Kevin M; Peppercorn, Jeffrey; Rugo, Hope S; Carlson, Martha; Cowden, Janice; Glenn, Lesley; Maues, Julia; McGlown, Sheila; Ni, Andy; Padron, Natalia; Lustberg, Maryam.
Afiliação
  • Loeser AL; Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Gao L; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. lgao11@partners.org.
  • Bardia A; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Burkard ME; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Kalinsky KM; Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Peppercorn J; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Rugo HS; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Carlson M; Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Cowden J; Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Glenn L; Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Maues J; Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • McGlown S; Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Ni A; Division of Biostatistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Padron N; Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Lustberg M; Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 196(3): 549-563, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36198984
PURPOSE: Although metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is treatable, it is not curable and most patients remain on treatment indefinitely. While oncologists commonly prescribe the recommended starting dose (RSD) from the FDA-approved label, patient tolerance may differ from that seen in clinical trials. We report on a survey of medical oncologists' perspectives about treatment-related toxicity and willingness to discuss flexible dosing with patients. METHODS: We disseminated a confidential survey via social media/email in Spring 2021. Eligible respondents needed to be US-based medical oncologists with experience treating patients with MBC. RESULTS: Of 131 responses, 119 were eligible. Physicians estimated that 47% of their patients reported distressing treatment-related side effects; of these, 15% visited the Emergency Room/hospital and 37% missed treatment. 74% (n = 87) of doctors reported improvement of patient symptoms after dose reduction. 87% (n = 104) indicated that they had ever, if appropriate, initiated treatment at lower doses. Most (85%, n = 101) respondents did not believe that the RSD is always more effective than a lower dose and 97% (n = 115) were willing to discuss individualized dosing with patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment-related side effects are prevalent among patients with MBC, resulting in missed treatments and acute care visits. To help patients tolerate treatment, oncologists may decrease initial and/or subsequent doses. The majority of oncologists reject the premise that a higher dose is always superior and are willing to discuss individualized dosing with patients. Given potential improvements regarding quality of life and clinical care, dose modifications should be part of routine shared decision-making between patients and oncologists.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos / Oncologistas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos / Oncologistas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article