Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ORal anticoagulation risks late aortic intervention in Conservatively managed type B Aortic dissection (ORCA study).
Jesse, Katarzyna; Meuli, Lorenz; Kopp, Reinhard; Reutersberg, Benedikt; Stadlbauer, Thomas; Zimmermann, Alexander; Dueppers, Philip.
Afiliação
  • Jesse K; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Meuli L; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kopp R; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Reutersberg B; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Stadlbauer T; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Zimmermann A; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Dueppers P; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 62(5)2022 10 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36200847
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Single-center retrospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of oral anticoagulation (OAC) on long-term outcomes of conservatively managed acute type B aortic dissection.

METHODS:

Clinical and morphological data of eligible patients from a high-volume vascular centre from 1 January 2003 through 31 December 2020 were evaluated. Patients were excluded for type A or non-A-non-B dissection, isolated abdominal dissection, intramural haematoma and connective tissue disease. The primary outcome was freedom from late aortic events (intervention, rupture and mortality). Secondary outcomes included spinal cord ischaemia, bleeding, reno-visceral artery occlusion, ilio-femoral intervention, dissection propagation, aortic growth, aortic remodelling, deterioration of false lumen thrombosis as well as 30-day and overall mortality. Time to event was analysed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with OAC as time-varying covariate and mortality as a competing risk. The impact of OAC was adjusted for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS:

A total of 69 patients [50 males, median age 65 (interquartile range 58-72) years] were enrolled. The median follow-up was 49.3 (28-92) months. A total of 47 patients (68%) received OAC at any time throughout the follow-up for a median length of 26 (11-61) months. Late aortic events occurred in 28 patients (41%) including intervention (n = 27, 39%) and rupture (n = 1, 1%). OAC was associated with more late aortic events (hazard ratio 3.94, 95% confidence interval 1.06-14.6, P = 0.040). Secondary outcomes were not associated with OAC.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our data suggest a relation of OAC therapy with an increased risk for late aortic interventions. Type B aortic dissection should not be the primary indication for OAC and patients with OAC for other indications require frequent follow-up imaging.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Procedimentos Endovasculares / Dissecção Aórtica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Procedimentos Endovasculares / Dissecção Aórtica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article