Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reason and reality-identifying barriers to patient enrolment for clinical trials in invasive candidiasis.
Sprute, Rosanne; Grothe, Jan H; Heringer, Sarah; Cornely, Oliver A.
Afiliação
  • Sprute R; Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, NRW, Germany.
  • Grothe JH; University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Chair Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Cologne, NRW, Germany.
  • Heringer S; German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, NRW, Germany.
  • Cornely OA; Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, NRW, Germany.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 77(12): 3475-3481, 2022 11 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36214051
OBJECTIVES: Enrolment of subjects to clinical trials investigating novel drugs for infectious diseases is an ongoing challenge. In this study, we evaluate factors associated with non-enrolment in treatment trials for invasive candidiasis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of pre-screening logs of patients that were assessed for enrolment in the three clinical trials ACTIVE (NCT00413218), APX001-201 (NCT03604705) and ReSTORE (NCT03667690), investigating novel drugs for invasive candidiasis between September 2007 and August 2021 to identify reasons for study ineligibility. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-six patients with invasive candidiasis were identified for potential study participation with n = 154 for the ACTIVE trial, n = 89 for APX001-201 and n = 13 for ReSTORE. Half of the potential participants were unable or unwilling to consent. We further identified comorbid conditions such as hepatic or renal impairment [21 hepatic and renal cases (13.6%) in ACTIVE; 12 hepatic (13.5%) and 28 renal cases (31.5%) in APX], prior antifungal treatment [11 cases (7.1%) in ACTIVE; 16 (18.0%) in APX; 7 (38.5%) in ReSTORE] and the last positive culture obtained ≥96 h prior to dosing [1 case (0.6%) in ACTIVE; 7 (7.9%) in APX; 5 (38.5%) in ReSTORE] as relevant reasons for non-enrolment. We also identified criteria repetitively used in the analysed studies that did not contribute substantially to ineligibility rates. Ultimately, 254/256 patients (99.2%) were ineligible for enrolment in the respective trial. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified barriers to enrolment in clinical trials assessing novel antifungal agents in invasive candidiasis. Identification of eligibility criteria associated with non-enrolment allows modification of future trial designs and may ultimately result in higher recruitment rates.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Candidíase Invasiva Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Candidíase Invasiva Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article