Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pediatric Shared Decision-Making for Simple and Complex Decisions: Findings From a Delphi Panel.
Eaton, Sarah M; Clark, Jonna D; Cummings, Christy L; Kon, Alexander A; Morrison, Wynne; Feudtner, Chris; Streuli, Jürg C.
Afiliação
  • Eaton SM; Institute of Biomedical Ethics.
  • Clark JD; Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
  • Cummings CL; Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Kon AA; Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Morrison W; Community Children's, Missoula, Montana.
  • Feudtner C; University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
  • Streuli JC; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Pediatrics ; 150(5)2022 11 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36217896
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To develop recommendations for pediatric shared decision-making (SDM).

METHODS:

We conducted a Delphi method study from 2020 to 2021 with an international panel (n = 21) of clinicians, researchers, and parents with expertise in pediatric SDM. We conducted semistructured interviews to identify the key processes of pediatric SDM. We coded the interviews using content analysis and developed a questionnaire on the potential processes of pediatric SDM. Using a Likert scale, panelists evaluated each process twice, once for simple decisions and once for complex decisions. Panelists were provided with a summary of the results and evaluated each process again. The processes that were agreed on for simple and complex decisions were reported as "fundamental processes." The processes that were agreed on for complex decisions were reported as "additional processes."

RESULTS:

A total of 79 recommendations were developed, including 29 fundamental processes and 14 additional processes for complex decisions. A recurring theme was the importance of personalizing the decision-making process. For example, the panel recommended that physicians should assess the family and child's desired roles in the decision-making process, assess their desired level of directiveness, and elicit and clarify their values, preferences, and goals. The panel also disagreed on several subprocesses, such as how to determine the child's role and the appropriate level of directiveness.

CONCLUSIONS:

An international expert panel developed recommendations for pediatric SDM for both simple and complex decisions. The recommendations highlight the importance of personalizing the decision-making process.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pais / Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pais / Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article