Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oral Chemotherapy Metric Performance in Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Practices: Updated Trends and Analysis.
Blinder, Victoria S; Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth; Jacobsen, Paul B; Kozlik, Mary May; Markham, Merry Jennifer; Siegel, Robert D; Kamal, Arif H; Crist, Stephanie T S; Rosenthal, Jon; Chiang, Anne C.
Afiliação
  • Blinder VS; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Garrett-Mayer E; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia.
  • Jacobsen PB; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Kozlik MM; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia.
  • Markham MJ; University of Florida College of Medicine, UF Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Siegel RD; Bon Secours St. Francis Cancer Center, Greenville, South Carolina.
  • Kamal AH; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina; and.
  • Crist STS; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia.
  • Rosenthal J; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia.
  • Chiang AC; Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 20(10): 1099-1106.e2, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36240846
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Oral chemotherapy performance measures were first introduced into ASCO's Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) in 2013. This study examined performance on these measures among QOPI-participating practices and evaluated whether it differed among practices based on meeting QOPI Certification Program standards.

METHODS:

A total of 192 QOPI-participating practices (certified, n=50 [26%]; not certified, n=142 [74%]) reported performance on oral chemotherapy measures in 2017 and 2018. Inclusion was limited to practices reporting on ≥3 charts for ≥1 oral chemotherapy measure. Performance was defined as the percentage of charts examined that adhered to the measure. Descriptive analyses were used to characterize performance within and across practices, and mixed-effects logistic regression models were conducted to compare performance based on certification status.

RESULTS:

Median performance across practices for the 9 oral chemotherapy measures examined ranged from 44% (education before the start of treatment addressing missed doses, toxicities, and clinical contact instructions [composite measure]) to 100% (documented dose, documented plan, and education about toxicities). Certified practices were more likely to provide education about clinic contact instructions than noncertified practices (odds ratio, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.00-24.0). Performance on all other measures was not significantly associated with certification status.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is wide variability in quality related to performance on oral chemotherapy measures across all QOPI-participating practices, and several areas were identified in which administration of oral chemotherapy could be improved. Our findings highlight the need for the development and implementation of appropriate standards that apply to oral chemotherapy and address the complexities that set it apart from parenteral treatment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Certificação / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Certificação / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article