Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Invited review: Current enteric methane mitigation options.
Beauchemin, Karen A; Ungerfeld, Emilio M; Abdalla, Adibe L; Alvarez, Clementina; Arndt, Claudia; Becquet, Philippe; Benchaar, Chaouki; Berndt, Alexandre; Mauricio, Rogerio M; McAllister, Tim A; Oyhantçabal, Walter; Salami, Saheed A; Shalloo, Laurence; Sun, Yan; Tricarico, Juan; Uwizeye, Aimable; De Camillis, Camillo; Bernoux, Martial; Robinson, Timothy; Kebreab, Ermias.
Afiliação
  • Beauchemin KA; Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1, Canada.
  • Ungerfeld EM; Centro Regional de Investigación Carillanca, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Vilcún, La Araucanía 4880000, Chile. Electronic address: emilio.ungerfeld@inia.cl.
  • Abdalla AL; Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo CEP 13416.000, Brazil.
  • Alvarez C; Research Department, TINE SA, Ås, 1430, Norway.
  • Arndt C; International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
  • Becquet P; International Feed Industry Federation, Wiehl 51657, Germany.
  • Benchaar C; Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1M 0C8, Canada.
  • Berndt A; Embrapa Southeast Livestock, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 234, CP 339. São Carlos, São Paulo CEP 13.560-970, Brazil.
  • Mauricio RM; Department of Biosystems Engineering, Federal University of Sao Joao Del Rey, Sao Joao, Minas Gerais 36325.000, Brazil.
  • McAllister TA; Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1, Canada.
  • Oyhantçabal W; Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, 12900, Uruguay.
  • Salami SA; Solutions Deployment Team, Alltech (UK) Ltd., Ryhall Road, Stamford, PE9 1TZ, United Kingdom.
  • Shalloo L; Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Department, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork P61 C996, Ireland.
  • Sun Y; Cargill Inc., Minneapolis, MN 55440.
  • Tricarico J; Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy, Rosemont, IL 60018.
  • Uwizeye A; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Animal Production and Health Division, Rome, 00153, Italy.
  • De Camillis C; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Animal Production and Health Division, Rome, 00153, Italy.
  • Bernoux M; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Office of Climate Change, Biodiversity and Environment, Rome, 00153, Italy.
  • Robinson T; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Animal Production and Health Division, Rome, 00153, Italy.
  • Kebreab E; Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis 95616.
J Dairy Sci ; 105(12): 9297-9326, 2022 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36270879
Ruminant livestock are an important source of anthropogenic methane (CH4). Decreasing the emissions of enteric CH4 from ruminant production is strategic to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5°C by 2050. Research in the area of enteric CH4 mitigation has grown exponentially in the last 2 decades, with various strategies for enteric CH4 abatement being investigated: production intensification, dietary manipulation (including supplementation and processing of concentrates and lipids, and management of forage and pastures), rumen manipulation (supplementation of ionophores, 3-nitrooxypropanol, macroalgae, alternative electron acceptors, and phytochemicals), and selection of low-CH4-producing animals. Other enteric CH4 mitigation strategies are at earlier stages of research but rapidly developing. Herein, we discuss and analyze the current status of available enteric CH4 mitigation strategies with an emphasis on opportunities and barriers to their implementation in confined and partial grazing production systems, and in extensive and fully grazing production systems. For each enteric CH4 mitigation strategy, we discuss its effectiveness to decrease total CH4 emissions and emissions on a per animal product basis, safety issues, impacts on the emissions of other greenhouse gases, as well as other economic, regulatory, and societal aspects that are key to implementation. Most research has been conducted with confined animals, and considerably more research is needed to develop, adapt, and evaluate antimethanogenic strategies for grazing systems. In general, few options are currently available for extensive production systems without feed supplementation. Continuous research and development are needed to develop enteric CH4 mitigation strategies that are locally applicable. Information is needed to calculate carbon footprints of interventions on a regional basis to evaluate the impact of mitigation strategies on net greenhouse gas emissions. Economically affordable enteric CH4 mitigation solutions are urgently needed. Successful implementation of safe and effective antimethanogenic strategies will also require delivery mechanisms and adequate technical support for producers, as well as consumer involvement and acceptance. The most appropriate metrics should be used in quantifying the overall climate outcomes associated with mitigation of enteric CH4 emissions. A holistic approach is required, and buy-in is needed at all levels of the supply chain.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gases de Efeito Estufa / Metano Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gases de Efeito Estufa / Metano Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article