Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Needle-free pharmacological sedation techniques in paediatric patients for imaging procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Rover, Ingeborg; Wylleman, Jasper; Dogger, Jaap J; Bramer, Wichor M; Hoeks, Sanne E; de Graaff, Jurgen C.
Afiliação
  • de Rover I; Department of Anaesthesiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Wylleman J; Department of Anaesthesiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Dogger JJ; Department of Anaesthesiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Bramer WM; Medical Library, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Hoeks SE; Department of Anaesthesiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Graaff JC; Department of Anaesthesiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.degraaff@erasmusmc.nl.
Br J Anaesth ; 130(1): 51-73, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36283870
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Sedation techniques and drugs are increasingly used in children undergoing imaging procedures. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we present an overview of literature concerning sedation of children aged 0-8 yr for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures using needle-free pharmacological techniques.

METHODS:

Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies on the use of needle-free pharmacological sedation techniques for MRI procedures in children aged 0-8 yr. Studies using i.v. or i.m. medication or advanced airway devices were excluded. We performed a meta-analysis on sedation success rate. Secondary outcomes were onset time, duration, recovery, and adverse events.

RESULTS:

Sixty-seven studies were included, with 22 380 participants. The pooled success rate for oral chloral hydrate was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-0.96); for oral chloral hydrate and intranasal dexmedetomidine 95% (95% CI 0.92-0.97); for rectal, oral, or intranasal midazolam 36% (95% CI 0.14-0.65); for oral pentobarbital 99% (95% CI 0.90-1.00); for rectal thiopental 92% (95% CI 0.85-0.96); for oral melatonin 75% (95% CI 0.54-0.89); for intranasal dexmedetomidine 62% (95% CI 0.38-0.82); for intranasal dexmedetomidine and midazolam 94% (95% CI 0.78-0.99); and for inhaled sevoflurane 98% (95% CI 0.97-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS:

We found a large variation in medication, dosage, and route of administration for needle-free sedation. Success rates for sedation techniques varied between 36% and 98%.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dexmedetomidina / Hipnóticos e Sedativos Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dexmedetomidina / Hipnóticos e Sedativos Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article