Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Receipt of Recommended Follow-up Care After a Positive Lung Cancer Screening Examination.
Rivera, M Patricia; Durham, Danielle D; Long, Jason M; Perera, Pasangi; Lane, Lindsay; Lamb, Derek; Metwally, Eman; Henderson, Louise M.
Afiliação
  • Rivera MP; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Rochester University Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
  • Durham DD; Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
  • Long JM; Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Perera P; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Lane L; Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Lamb D; Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Metwally E; Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Henderson LM; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(11): e2240403, 2022 11 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36326760
ABSTRACT
Importance Maximizing benefits of lung cancer screening requires timely follow-up after a positive screening test. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) recommends testing and follow-up timing based on the screening result.

Objective:

To determine rates of and factors associated with recommended follow-up after a positive lung cancer screening examination by Lung-RADS category. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

This prospective cohort study of lung cancer screening examinations performed from January 1, 2015, through July 31, 2020, with follow-up through July 31, 2021, was conducted at 5 academic and community lung cancer screening sites in North Carolina. Participants included 685 adults with a positive screening examination, Lung-RADS categories 3, 4A, 4B, or 4X. Statistical analysis was performed from December 2020 to March 2022. Exposures Individual age, race, sex, smoking exposure, year of lung cancer screening examination, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, body mass index, referring clinician specialty, rural or urban residence. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

Adherence, defined as receipt of recommended follow-up test or procedure after the positive screen per ACR Lung-RADS timeframes 6 months for Lung-RADS 3 and 3 months for Lung-RADS 4A. For Lung-RADS 4B or 4X, adherence was defined as follow-up care within 4 weeks, as ACR Lung-RADS does not specify a timeframe.

Results:

Among the 685 individuals included in this study who underwent lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography, 416 (60.7%) were aged at least 65 years, 123 (18.0%) were Black, 562 (82.0%) were White, and 352 (51.4%) were male. Overall adherence to recommended follow-up was 42.6% (292 of 685) and varied by Lung-RADS category Lung-RADS 3 = 30.0% (109 of 363), Lung-RADS 4A = 49.5% (96 of 194), Lung-RADS 4B or 4X = 68.0% (87 of 128). Extending the follow-up time increased adherence Lung-RADS 3 = 68.6% (249 of 363) within 9 months, Lung-RADS 4A = 77.3% (150 of 194) within 5 months, and Lung-RADS 4B or 4X = 80.5% (103 of 128) within 62 days. For Lung-RADS 3, recommended follow-up was less likely among those currently smoking vs those who quit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.78). In Lung-RADS 4A, recommended follow-up was less likely in Black individuals vs White individuals (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.86). For Lung-RADS 4B or 4X, recommended follow-up was more likely in female individuals vs male individuals (aOR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.09-7.28) and less likely in those currently smoking vs those who quit (aOR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.80). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, adherence to recommended follow-up after a positive screening examination was low but improved among nodules with a higher suspicion of cancer and after extending the follow-up timeline. However, the association of extending the follow-up time of screen-detected nodules with outcomes at the population level, outside of a clinical trial, is unknown. These findings suggest that studies to understand why recommended follow-up is lower in Black individuals, male individuals, and individuals currently smoking are needed to develop strategies to improve adherence.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article