Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The usefulness and ergonomics of a new robotic system for flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for treating renal stones.
Park, Juhyun; Gwak, Chan Hoon; Kim, Dongwon; Shin, Jung Hyun; Lim, Bumjin; Kim, Joonhwan; Cheon, Byungsik; Han, Jungmin; Kwon, Dong-Soo; Park, Hyung Keun.
Afiliação
  • Park J; Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Gwak CH; Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim D; Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Shin JH; Department of Urology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lim B; Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim J; ROEN Surgical Inc., Daejeon, Korea.
  • Cheon B; ROEN Surgical Inc., Daejeon, Korea.
  • Han J; ROEN Surgical Inc., Daejeon, Korea.
  • Kwon DS; Robotics Program, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea.
  • Park HK; ROEN Surgical Inc., Daejeon, Korea.
Investig Clin Urol ; 63(6): 647-655, 2022 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36347554
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the usefulness and ergonomics of a newly developed robotic system for flexible ureteroscopy (easyUretero). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

During in vitro testing, six participants performed renal stone removal four times in an artificial kidney-ureter-bladder model. Each participant manipulated a single-use digital flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue) with their hands and the robotic system, sequentially. We compared the task completion times of each participant. The ergonomics of and operational satisfaction with each procedure were assessed by questionnaires. In vivo tests evaluated the operability and safety of the robotic system in two live female pigs. We checked that all the steps of flexible lithotomy for renal stones could be completed individually.

RESULTS:

The task completion time with the robotic system during in vitro testing was significantly longer than with manual ureteroscopy regardless of the operator's competence level (expert professors 282.6±92.4 seconds vs. 73.6±43.3 seconds, p<0.001; fellows 247.5±57.7 seconds vs. 95.8±43.7 seconds, p<0.001; residents 281.3±111.0 seconds vs. 188.6±138.6 seconds, p<0.001). The residents took more time to remove the upper and mid caliceal stones with the robotic system. The ergonomic evaluation was better for the robotic system, but operational satisfaction was lower, and there was no statistical difference among the groups. In vivo tests showed that all the steps of robotic flexible ureteroscopy could be completed without difficulty. No safety issues were encountered during the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS:

The robotic system (easyUretero) was ergonomic and safe for flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for renal stones.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Litotripsia a Laser / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cálculos Renais / Litotripsia a Laser / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article