[Relationship of diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters with the pathologic type and prognosis of rectal tumors].

ABSTRACT

Objective: To explore the application value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in the differential diagnosis of rectal tumors and evaluating the prognostic factors associated with rectal adenocarcinoma. Methods: A total of 105 patients with rectal tumors admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from December 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance DKI scanning. The mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis (MK) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured and the relationship of these parameters with pathological types and prognostic factors of rectal tumor were analyzed. The diagnostic efficacy of MD, MK, and ADC for positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) and extramural venous invasion (EMVI) of rectal adenocarcinoma was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: MD and ADC were only related to pathological type. The MD and ADC were (2.091±0.390)×10(-3) and (1.478±0.265)×10(-3) mm(2)/s in mucinous adenocarcinoma, higher than (1.136±0.182)×10(-3) and (0.767±0.077)×10(-3) mm(2)/s in unspecified adenocarcinoma and (1.617±0.697)×10(-3) and (0.940±0.179)×10(-3) mm(2)/s in tubulo-villous adenoma. The MD and ADC in unspecified adenocarcinoma were lower than those in tubule-villous adenoma (P<0.05). Nevertheless, MK was associated with pathological type, N stage, CRM and EMVI. The MK was 0.566±0.110 in mucinous adenocarcinoma, lower than 0.982±0.135 in unspecified adenocarcinoma and 0.827±0.121 in tubulo-villous adenoma. The MK in unspecified adenocarcinoma was higher than that in intubulo-villous adenoma. The MK was 0.984±0.107 in pN1-2, higher than 0.881±0.146 in pN0. The MK was 0.990±0.142 in positive CRM, higher than 0.862±0.114 in negative CRM. The MK was 0.996±0.140 in positive EMVI, higher than 0.832±0.100 in negative EMVI (P<0.05). The ROC curves showed that the AUCs of MD, MK and ADC in diagnosing positive CRM were 0.459, 0.653 and 0.408, respectively; with MK=1.006 as the optimal diagnostic threshold, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 51.9% and 81.0%, respectively. The AUCs of MD, MK and ADC values in diagnosing positive EMVI were 0.510, 0.662 and 0.388, respectively; with MK=1.010 as the optimal diagnostic threshold, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 50.9% and 87.5%, respectively. Conclusions: DKI quantitative parameter is helpful for discriminating rectal tubulo-villous adenoma, unspecified adenocarcinoma, and mucinous adenocarcinoma, and is helpful for predicting the prognosis of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. High MK is associated with positive CRM and EMVI.