Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of clinical applicability of automated liver parenchyma segmentation of multi-center magnetic resonance images.
Nainamalai, Varatharajan; Prasad, Pravda Jith Ray; Pelanis, Egidijus; Edwin, Bjørn; Albregtsen, Fritz; Elle, Ole Jakob; P Kumar, Rahul.
Afiliação
  • Nainamalai V; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
  • Prasad PJR; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
  • Pelanis E; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Edwin B; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
  • Albregtsen F; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Elle OJ; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
  • P Kumar R; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eur J Radiol Open ; 9: 100448, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36386761
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Automated algorithms for liver parenchyma segmentation can be used to create patient-specific models (PSM) that assist clinicians in surgery planning. In this work, we analyze the clinical applicability of automated deep learning methods together with level set post-processing for liver segmentation in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance images.

Methods:

UNet variants with/without attention gate, multiple loss functions, and level set post-processing were used in the workflow. A multi-center, multi-vendor dataset from Oslo laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis clinical trial is used in our study. The dataset of 150 volumes is divided as 81252519 corresponding to trainvalidationtestclinical evaluation respectively. We evaluate the clinical use, time to edit automated segmentation, tumor regions, boundary leakage, and over-and-under segmentations of predictions.

Results:

The deep learning algorithm shows a mean Dice score of 0.9696 in liver segmentation, and we also examined the potential of post-processing to improve the PSMs. The time to create clinical use segmentations of level set post-processed predictions shows a median time of 16 min which is 2 min less than deep learning inferences. The intra-observer variations between manually corrected deep learning and level set post-processed segmentations show a 3% variation in the Dice score. The clinical evaluation shows that 7 out of 19 cases of both deep learning and level set post-processed segmentations contain all required anatomy and pathology, and hence these results could be used without any manual corrections.

Conclusions:

The level set post-processing reduces the time to create clinical standard segmentations, and over-and-under segmentations to a certain extent. The time advantage greatly supports clinicians to spend their valuable time with patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article