Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Saving the Exposed Deep Brain Stimulation Implant: A Comprehensive Review of Implant Extrusion and Reconstructive Options.
Zhang, Steven Liben; Lim, Jia Xu; Ho, Siyun Michelle; Cheong, Ee Cherk; Lee, Geraldine Hwee Ping; Wan, Kai Rui; Ng, Wai Hoe; Pek, Chong Han.
Afiliação
  • Zhang SL; From the Section of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital.
  • Lim JX; Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.
  • Ho SM; From the Section of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital.
  • Cheong EC; From the Section of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital.
  • Lee GHP; From the Section of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital.
  • Wan KR; Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.
  • Ng WH; Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.
  • Pek CH; From the Section of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital.
Ann Plast Surg ; 89(6): e21-e30, 2022 12 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36416693
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of Parkinson disease is susceptible to complications, such as hardware extrusion, most commonly at the scalp and chest. The authors describe their experience with the management of hardware extrusion and reconstruction with one of the largest single-institution experience and suggest an evidence-based treatment algorithm for the management of such cases.

METHODS:

A retrospective review of hospital records was performed to identify patients who underwent DBS-related surgery and reconstruction from January 2015 to April 2020. Management of these patients involved culture-directed antibiotics, local wound debridement, various forms of reconstruction, and hardware removal when indicated.

RESULTS:

Ninety-four patients with 131 DBS-related procedures were included. Twelve patients (12.8%) had hardware extrusion, of which 6 occurred primarily at the scalp and 6 occurred primarily at the chest. Primary closure of scalp wounds (odds ratio, 0.05 [0.004-0.71], P = 0.035) was negatively associated with treatment success. The type of reconstruction of chest wounds did not affect its success ( P = 0.58); however, none of them involved a new surgical bed, such as contralateral or hypochondrial placement.

CONCLUSIONS:

Hardware extrusion is a significant complication of DBS-related surgery. Management of extrusion at the scalp should involve the use of tension-free, well-vascularized locoregional flaps as opposed to primary closure. Implantable pulse generator extrusions at the chest can be managed with both primary closure and repositioning in a new surgical bed. Extruded DBS implants may be salvaged with appropriate reconstructive considerations, and the authors suggest an evidence-based treatment algorithm.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Parkinson / Estimulação Encefálica Profunda / Retalhos de Tecido Biológico Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Parkinson / Estimulação Encefálica Profunda / Retalhos de Tecido Biológico Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article