Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation Therapy Expenditures Through the First 8 Performance Periods of the Oncology Care Model at a Statewide Multispecialty Health System.
De, Brian; Andres, Grant; Bates, Christine; Staren, Edgar; Kutscher, Eric; Brooks, Donald J; Thaker, Gautam H; Buscema, Joseph; Gin, Robert; Thaker, Nikhil.
Afiliação
  • De B; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Andres G; Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Bates C; Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Staren E; Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Kutscher E; Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Brooks DJ; Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Thaker GH; Bayta Systems, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Buscema J; Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Gin R; Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Thaker N; Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, Arizona; Bayta Systems, Tucson, Arizona. Electronic address: Nikhil.Thaker@usoncology.com.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 116(3): 491-499, 2023 07 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36427644
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to use real world data to assess trends in radiation therapy (RT) treatment fractionation and cost under the Oncology Care Model (OCM) through the first 8 performance periods (PPs). METHODS: We identified 17,157 episodes of care from 9898 patients treated at a statewide multispecialty health system through the first 8 6-month PPs (PP1-8: July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2020) of the OCM. Spending was stratified by 10 expenditure domains (eg, Part B/D drugs, radiation oncology [RO], etc), and 21 disease sites were extracted from claims data, from which an analysis of RO expenditures was performed on 2219 episodes from 2033 patients treated with RT. Expenses are expressed in per-beneficiary, per-episode terms. RESULTS: RO expenditures comprised 3% ($14.7M) of total spending over the 8 periods. By primary cancer, the largest RO expenses were for breast ($2.9M; 20%), prostate ($2.9M; 19%), and lung cancer ($2.8M; 13%). For RO, total per-episode average spending remained roughly constant between PP1 ($6314) and PP8 ($6664; Ptrend > .05) and decreased ($6314-$6215) when indexed to the Consumer Price Index for July 2016. Average number of RT fractions per episode decreased from 19.2 in PP1 to 18.6 in PP8; this decrease was most notably seen for breast (-2.1), lung (-2.8), and female genitourinary (-3.5) cancers. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) charges accounted for $7.6M (51%) of RT spending and increased 5% from PP1 to 8, whereas conventional external beam RT made up $3.0M (21%) and decreased 8%. Expenses for image guidance ($2.5M; 17%; +2% from PP1-8) and stereotactic RT ($1.3M; 9%; +1%) increased. CONCLUSIONS: In inflation-adjusted terms, total RO expenditures have declined despite greater use of IMRT, stereotactic RT, and image guidance. Conversely, oncology costs have risen because of drug spending. Successful payment models must prioritize high-cost spending areas-including novel drug therapies-while accounting for high-value care and patient outcomes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia (Especialidade) / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia (Especialidade) / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article