Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinician and Algorithmic Application of the 2019 and 2022 Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention Shock Stages in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry.
Patel, Siddharth M; Berg, David D; Bohula, Erin A; Baird-Zars, Vivian M; Barnett, Christopher F; Barsness, Gregory W; Chaudhry, Sunit-Preet; Daniels, Lori B; van Diepen, Sean; Ghafghazi, Shahab; Goldfarb, Michael J; Jentzer, Jacob C; Katz, Jason N; Kenigsberg, Benjamin B; Lawler, Patrick R; Miller, P Elliott; Papolos, Alexander I; Park, Jeong-Gun; Potter, Brian J; Prasad, Rajnish; Singam, N Sarma V; Sinha, Shashank S; Solomon, Michael A; Teuteberg, Jeffrey J; Morrow, David A.
Afiliação
  • Patel SM; Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., J.-G.P., D.A.M.).
  • Berg DD; Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., J.-G.P., D.A.M.).
  • Bohula EA; Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., J.-G.P., D.A.M.).
  • Baird-Zars VM; Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., J.-G.P., D.A.M.).
  • Barnett CF; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (C.F.B.).
  • Barsness GW; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (G.W.B., J.C.J., N.S.V.S.).
  • Chaudhry SP; Department of Medicine, St. Vincent Heart Center, Indianapolis, IN (S.-P.C.).
  • Daniels LB; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (L.B.D.).
  • van Diepen S; Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (S.v.D.).
  • Ghafghazi S; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville, KY (S.G.).
  • Goldfarb MJ; Division of Cardiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (M.J.G.).
  • Jentzer JC; Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., J.-G.P., D.A.M.).
  • Katz JN; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (G.W.B., J.C.J., N.S.V.S.).
  • Kenigsberg BB; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (J.N.K.).
  • Lawler PR; Departments of Cardiology and Critical Care, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (B.B.K.).
  • Miller PE; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre at Toronto General Hospital, Division of Cardiology and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (P.R.L.).
  • Papolos AI; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (P.E.M.).
  • Park JG; Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., J.-G.P., D.A.M.).
  • Potter BJ; Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.M.P., D.D.B., E.A.B., V.M.B.-Z., J.-G.P., D.A.M.).
  • Prasad R; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Research Center and Cardiovascular Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.J.P.).
  • Singam NSV; Wellstar Health System, Marietta, GA (R.P.).
  • Sinha SS; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (G.W.B., J.C.J., N.S.V.S.).
  • Solomon MA; Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Center, Falls Church, VA (S.S.S.).
  • Teuteberg JJ; Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (M.A.S.).
  • Morrow DA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, CA (J.J.T.).
Circ Heart Fail ; 16(1): e009714, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36458542
BACKGROUND: Algorithmic application of the 2019 Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) shock stages effectively stratifies mortality risk for patients with cardiogenic shock. However, clinician assessment of SCAI staging may differ. Moreover, the implications of the 2022 SCAI criteria update remain incompletely defined. METHODS: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter registry of cardiac intensive care units (CICUs). Between 2019 and 2021, participating centers (n=32) contributed at least a 2-month snapshot of consecutive medical CICU admissions. In-hospital mortality was assessed across 3 separate staging methods: clinician assessment, Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network algorithmic application of the 2019 SCAI criteria, and a revision of the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network application using the 2022 SCAI criteria. RESULTS: Of 9612 admissions, 1340 (13.9%) presented with cardiogenic shock with in-hospital mortality of 35.2%. Both clinician and algorithm-based staging using the 2019 SCAI criteria identified a stepwise gradient of mortality risk (stage C-E: 19.0% to 83.7% and 14.6% to 52.2%, respectively; Ptrend<0.001 for each). Clinician assignment of SCAI stages identified higher risk patients compared with algorithm-based assignment (stage D: 49.9% versus 29.3%; stage E: 83.7% versus 52.2%). Algorithmic application of the 2022 SCAI criteria, with incorporation of the vasoactive-inotropic score, more closely approximated clinician staging (mortality for stage C-E: 21.9% to 70.5%; Ptrend<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both clinician and algorithm-based application of the 2019 SCAI stages identify a stepwise gradient of mortality risk, although clinician-staging may better allocate higher risk patients into advanced SCAI stages. Updated algorithmic staging using the 2022 SCAI criteria and vasoactive-inotropic score further refines risk stratification.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cardiologia / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cardiologia / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article