Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the clinical utility of sGaw as a response variable in methacholine challenge testing.
Parker, Jacqueline; Tzeng, Allison; Wayne, Shawn; Haynes, Jeffrey M; Irvin, Charles G; Kaminsky, David A.
Afiliação
  • Parker J; Central Vermont Medical Center, Berlin, Vermont, USA.
  • Tzeng A; University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Wayne S; Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Haynes JM; Elliot Health System, Manchester, New Hampshire, USA.
  • Irvin CG; Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Kaminsky DA; Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Respirology ; 28(5): 437-444, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36478621
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is commonly assessed by a methacholine challenge test (MCT), during which a provocative concentration causing a 20% reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ) (PC20 ) < 8 mg/ml is considered a positive response. However, a fall in specific airway conductance (sGaw) may also have clinical significance. The purpose of this study was to assess whether AHR determined by a provocative concentration causing a 40% reduction in sGaw (PC40 ) < 8 mg/ml corresponds to a clinical diagnosis of asthma.

METHODS:

We analysed the changes in spirometry, lung volumes and sGaw during MCT in 211 randomly selected patients being evaluated for AHR to support a clinical diagnosis of asthma.

RESULTS:

The mean (SD) age of the group was 53 (15) years, with 141 women (67%). Overall lung function was normal, with FEV1  = 92 (15) % predicted, total lung capacity = 97 (13) % predicted and sGaw = 0.19 (0.15-0.23) L/s/cm H2 O/L, (median, 25-75 IQR). There were many more patients who responded by PC40 only (n = 120) than who responded by PC20 (n = 52). There was no significant difference in asthma diagnosis between the PC20 (98%) and PC40 (93%) groups, and we estimate 34% of patients with a diagnosis of asthma would have been classified as having no AHR if only the FEV1 criterion was used.

CONCLUSION:

Changes in sGaw during MCT indicate clinically significant AHR in support of a clinical diagnosis of asthma among patients being evaluated for asthma.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipersensibilidade Respiratória / Asma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipersensibilidade Respiratória / Asma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article