Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
End-Of-Life Care in the Potential Donor after Circulatory Death: A Systematic Review.
Cappucci, Stefanie P; Smith, Wade S; Schwartzstein, Richard; White, Douglas B; Mitchell, Susan L; Fehnel, Corey R.
Afiliação
  • Cappucci SP; Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Smith WS; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Schwartzstein R; Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • White DB; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Mitchell SL; Department of Critical Care, University of PittsburghSchool of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Fehnel CR; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Neurohospitalist ; 13(1): 61-68, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36531837
ABSTRACT

Background:

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is becoming increasingly common, yet little is known about the way potential donors receive end-of-life care.

Purpose:

The aims of this systematic review are to describe the current practice in end-of-life care for potential donors and identify metrics that are being used to assess discomfort among these patients. Research design and Study Sample This review encompasses published literature between June 1, 2000 and June 31, 2020 of end-of-life care received by potential DCD patients. The population of interest was defined as patients eligible for Maastracht classification III donation after circulatory death for a solid organ transplantation. Outcomes examined included analgesic or palliative protocols, and surrogates of discomfort (eg dyspnea, agitation).

Results:

Among 141 unique articles, 27 studies were included for full review. The primary reason for exclusion was lack of protocol description, or lack of reporting on analgesic medications. No primary research studies specifically examined distress in the DCD eligible population. Numerous professional guidelines were identified. Surveys of critical care practitioners identified concerns regarding the impact of symptom management on hastening the dying process in the DCD population as a potential barrier to end-of-life palliative treatment.

Conclusions:

There is a paucity of empirical evidence for end-of-life symptom assessment and management for DCD patients. Key evidence gaps identified for DCD include the need for i) a multidisciplinary structure of treatment teams and preferred environment for DCD, ii) objective tools for monitoring of distress in this patient population, and iii) evidence guiding the administration of analgesic medications following withdrawal of life sustaining therapy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article