Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Challenges in the Diagnosis of XY Differences of Sexual Development.
Bumbuliene, Zana; Buzinskiene, Diana; Banuskeviciene, Greta; Sidlovska, Evelina; Preiksaitiene, Egle; Utkus, Algirdas.
Afiliação
  • Bumbuliene Z; Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Buzinskiene D; Centre of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Banuskeviciene G; Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Sidlovska E; Centre of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Preiksaitiene E; Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Utkus A; National Center of Pathology, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, LT-08406 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(12)2022 Nov 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36556938
Background: We report the clinical case of female patient with 46,XY difference of sexual development (DSD) and discuss the challenges in the differential diagnosis between complete gonadal dysgenesis (also called Swyer syndrome) and complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Case Presentation: The patient's with primary amenorrhea gynaecological examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the absence of the uterus and a very short vagina. Two sclerotic structures, similar to ovaries, were recognised bilaterally in the iliac regions. Hormonal assay tests revealed hypergonadotropic hypogonadism and the testosterone level was above normal. The karyotype was 46,XY and a diagnosis of Swyer syndrome was made. At the age of 41, the patient underwent a gynaecological review and after evaluating her tests and medical history, the previous diagnosis was questioned. Therefore, a molecular analysis of sex-determining region Y (SRY) and androgen receptor (AR) genes was made and the results instead led to a definite diagnosis of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Conclusions: The presented case illustrates that differentiating between complete gonadal dysgenesis and complete androgen insensitivity can be challenging. A well-established diagnosis is crucial because the risk of malignancy is different in those two syndromes, as well as the timing and importance of gonadectomy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome de Resistência a Andrógenos / Disgenesia Gonadal 46 XY Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome de Resistência a Andrógenos / Disgenesia Gonadal 46 XY Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article