Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of fertility preservation services for cancer patients: a single institution experience.
McCarter, Kelly; Stewart, Joshua; Gordhandas, Sushmita; Aluko, Ashley; Shah, Nirali; Schattman, Glenn; Rosenwaks, Zev.
Afiliação
  • McCarter K; The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
  • Stewart J; The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
  • Gordhandas S; Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Aluko A; The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
  • Shah N; New York University Fertility Center, New York, New York.
  • Schattman G; The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
  • Rosenwaks Z; The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
F S Rep ; 3(4): 349-354, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36568923
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To analyze the use of services regarding fertility preservation (FP) in cancer patients at a single institution.

Design:

A retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

Academic medical center. Patients A total of 208 FP referrals.

Interventions:

None. Main Outcome

Measures:

Method of FP; time from referral to FP intervention.

Results:

A total of 553 patients were referred to a reproductive specialist for FP in the setting of a medical diagnosis from 2011 to 2016. Of these, 208 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria and met with a reproductive specialist. Ninety patients underwent FP services. The average age at referral was 30.9 ± 7.9 years. Breast cancer (n=94, 45%) and leukemia/lymphoma (n=62, 30%) were the most prevalent cancer diagnoses. A 68.9% of patients underwent oocyte cryopreservation (n=62), 26.7% underwent embryo cryopreservation (n=24) and 4.4% underwent ovarian tissue preservation (n=4). The time interval from the referral to the FP intervention ranged from 1 to 810 days, with a median of 17 days.

Conclusions:

In the setting of a cancer diagnosis, most patients undergoing FP intervention underwent oocyte cryopreservation, were <35 years old, and underwent FP intervention in <30 days from referral. Whereas FP should ideally be initiated at the time of cancer diagnosis, all patients with a cancer diagnosis should be referred to a reproductive specialist and counseled on options for FP to preserve the optionality for the reproductive future they desire.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article