Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A robust and readily implementable method for the meta-analysis of response ratios with and without missing standard deviations.
Nakagawa, Shinichi; Noble, Daniel W A; Lagisz, Malgorzata; Spake, Rebecca; Viechtbauer, Wolfgang; Senior, Alistair M.
Afiliação
  • Nakagawa S; Evolution & Ecology Research Centre and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Noble DWA; Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Lagisz M; Evolution & Ecology Research Centre and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Spake R; School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
  • Viechtbauer W; Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Senior AM; Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences and Sydney Centre for Precision Data Science, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Camperdown, Australia.
Ecol Lett ; 26(2): 232-244, 2023 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36573275
The log response ratio, lnRR, is the most frequently used effect size statistic for meta-analysis in ecology. However, often missing standard deviations (SDs) prevent estimation of the sampling variance of lnRR. We propose new methods to deal with missing SDs via a weighted average coefficient of variation (CV) estimated from studies in the dataset that do report SDs. Across a suite of simulated conditions, we find that using the average CV to estimate sampling variances for all observations, regardless of missingness, performs with minimal bias. Surprisingly, even with missing SDs, this simple method outperforms the conventional approach (basing each effect size on its individual study-specific CV) with complete data. This is because the conventional method ultimately yields less precise estimates of the sampling variances than using the pooled CV from multiple studies. Our approach is broadly applicable and can be implemented in all meta-analyses of lnRR, regardless of 'missingness'.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article