Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Swiss versus Standard Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind, Parallel Trial.
Pradhan, Saroj K; Angst, Felix; Xu, Jie; Gantenbein, Andreas R; Lehmann, Susanne; Sandor, Peter S; Li, Yiming; Furian, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Pradhan SK; Research Department, Swiss University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
  • Angst F; Research Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
  • Xu J; TCM Ming Dao, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
  • Gantenbein AR; Research Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
  • Lehmann S; Research Department, Swiss University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
  • Sandor PS; TCM Ming Dao, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
  • Li Y; Neurorehabilitation & Research Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
  • Furian M; Research Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland.
J Pain Res ; 15: 4055-4064, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36579179
Introduction: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) cannot sufficiently be treated by pharmacological therapy and generates substantial health-care costs worldwide. Acupuncture, a cost-effective, safe and non-pharmacological therapy, has shown promising results in relieving acute low back pain; however, the optimal acupuncture therapy for CLBP remains controversial. This study will compare two acupuncture methods for pain relief in CLBP. Methods and Analysis: This randomized, controlled, single-blind, parallel trial will be conducted in patients with clinically diagnosed CLBP with a disease duration ≥3 months and an average pain intensity of ≥4 points on an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (pain-NRS) on the previous 7 days. Patients will be randomized to 9-week acupuncture therapy using Jiu Gong Points (termed Swiss low back acupuncture, SLBA) or standard acupuncture (SA) therapy (weeks 1-6: two sessions/week, weeks 7-9: one session/week, 15 sessions/patient in total). Measurements will be conducted before the first session (T1), at the end of the 9-week therapy (T2) and after 3- and 6-month follow-up (T3 and T4). The primary hypothesis is that 9 weeks of SLBA will be superior in reducing the pain severity assessed by the pain-NRS compared to SA therapy for CLBP. Secondary outcomes will be derived from the Short-Form 36, Oswestry Disability Index, Multidimensional Pain Inventory questionnaire, Symptom Checklist-90 - Revised questionnaire and a daily pain diary. Assuming a minimal clinically important difference in the pain-NRS of 0.39 and an effect size of ≥0.6 between SLBA and SA, 80% power, 0.05 alpha level and 20% dropouts, a total of 55 patients/arm will be required. The primary outcome will be analyzed in the intention-to-treat population using chained linear regression models. Patients, outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment arm. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05232487.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article