Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biochemical outcomes and toxicities in young men with prostate cancer after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation: Prospective cohort study in 6662 patients.
Katayama, Norihisa; Yorozu, Atsunori; Kikuchi, Takashi; Higashide, Satoshi; Masui, Koji; Kojima, Shinsuke; Saito, Shiro.
Afiliação
  • Katayama N; Department of Radiology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kagawa, Japan. Electronic address: n-katayama@bea.hi-ho.ne.jp.
  • Yorozu A; Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kikuchi T; Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Japan.
  • Higashide S; Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Japan.
  • Masui K; Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Kojima S; Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Japan.
  • Saito S; Department of Urology, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Brachytherapy ; 22(3): 293-303, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36599746
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We evaluated the effect of age, <60 and ≥60 years, on biochemical outcomes and toxicities in patients with prostate cancer who underwent permanent seed implantation (PI) ± external beam radiation therapy ± hormone therapy in a national Japanese prospective cohort study (J-POPS). METHODS AND MATERIALS The safety and efficacy analyses included 6721 and 6662 patients, respectively. We categorized patients into two age groups <60 (n = 716) and ≥60 (n = 6,005) years. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to estimate the marginal effect of age on biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF) using a Phoenix definition and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS:

The median followup period was 60.0 months. Without PSM, men <60 years demonstrated similar 5-year bFFF (96.3%) compared with men ≥60 years (95.6%; p = 0.576); percent positive biopsies, biologically effective dose, Gleason score, risk classification, and supplemental external beam radiation therapy (p <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, 0.008, and <0.001) were significantly associated with bFFF while age was not (p = 0.576). With PSM, bFFF was not significantly different between age groups (p = 0.664); however, men <60 years showed a significantly lower incidence of declining erectile function, grade ≥2 all urinary toxicities, urinary frequency/urgency, and rectal bleeding (p <0.001, 0.024, 0.031, and 0.010) than men ≥60 years.

CONCLUSIONS:

After PI, men <60 years achieved a comparable 5-year biochemical control rate and showed a lower incidence of several toxicities compared to men ≥60 years. This suggests that PI should be an excellent treatment option for men <60 years with prostate cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Braquiterapia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Braquiterapia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article