Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of PSMA-PET on Oncologic Control in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Experienced PSA Persistence or Recurrence.
Bianchi, Lorenzo; Ceci, Francesco; Costa, Francesco; Balestrazzi, Eleonora; Droghetti, Matteo; Piazza, Pietro; Pissavini, Alessandro; Mei, Riccardo; Farolfi, Andrea; Castellucci, Paolo; Puliatti, Stefano; Larcher, Alessandro; Gandaglia, Giorgio; Robesti, Daniele; Mottrie, Alexandre; Briganti, Alberto; Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe; Fanti, Stefano; Montorsi, Francesco; Schiavina, Riccardo; Brunocilla, Eugenio.
Afiliação
  • Bianchi L; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Ceci F; University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
  • Costa F; Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
  • Balestrazzi E; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
  • Droghetti M; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Piazza P; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Pissavini A; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Mei R; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Farolfi A; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Castellucci P; Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Puliatti S; Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Larcher A; Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
  • Gandaglia G; Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41122 Modena, Italy.
  • Robesti D; Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
  • Mottrie A; ORSI Academy, 9300 Melle, Belgium.
  • Briganti A; Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Morganti AG; Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Fanti S; Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  • Montorsi F; Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
  • Schiavina R; ORSI Academy, 9300 Melle, Belgium.
  • Brunocilla E; Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(1)2022 Dec 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36612242
ABSTRACT

Background:

Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is currently recommended to restage prostate cancer (PCa) and to guide the delivery of salvage treatments. We aim to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients with recurrent PCa who received PSMA-PET.

Methods:

324 hormone-sensitive PCa with PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy who underwent PSMA-PET in three high-volume European Centres. Patients have been stratified as pre-salvage who never received salvage treatments (n = 134), and post-salvage, including patients who received previous salvage therapies (n = 190). Patients with oligorecurrent (≤3 lesions), PSMA-positive disease underwent PSMA-directed treatments salvage radiotherapy (sRT) or Metastases-directed therapy (MDT). Patients with polirecurrent (>3 lesions) PSMA-positive disease were treated with systemic therapy. Patients with negative PSMA-PET were treated with sRT or systemic therapies or observation. The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant Pca free survival (CRPC-FS).

Results:

median follow up was 23 months. In the pre-salvage setting, the PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS estimates at 3 years were 66.2% vs. 38.9%, 95.2% vs. 73.7% and 94.9% vs. 93.1% in patients with negative vs. positive PSMA-PET, respectively (all p ≥ 0.2). In the post-salvage setting, the PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS estimates at 3 years were 59.5% vs. 29.1%, 92.7% vs. 65.1% and 98.8% vs. 88.8% in patients with negative vs. positive PSMA-PET, respectively (all p ≤ 0.01). At multivariable analyses, a positive PSMA-PET was an independent predictor of progression (HR = 2.15) and metastatic disease (HR 2.37; all p ≤ 0.03).

Conclusion:

PSMA-PET in recurrent PCa detects the site of recurrence guiding salvage treatments and has a prognostic role in patients who received previous salvage treatments.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article