Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Selection of motion management in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy and its impact on treatment time.
Hardcastle, Nicholas; Gaudreault, Mathieu; Yeo, Adam U; Ungureanu, Elena; Markham, Cathy; Barnes, Rebecca; Chander, Sarat; Chu, Julie.
Afiliação
  • Hardcastle N; Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Gaudreault M; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Yeo AU; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
  • Ungureanu E; Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Markham C; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Barnes R; Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Chander S; Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Chu J; Department of Radiation Therapy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 25: 100407, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36655214
ABSTRACT
Background and

purpose:

Reduction of respiratory tumour motion is important in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to reduce side effects and improve tumour control probability. We have assessed the distribution of use of voluntary exhale breath hold (EBH), abdominal compression (AC), free breathing gating (gating) and free breathing (FB), and the impact of these on treatment time. Materials and

Methods:

We assessed all patients treated in a single institution with liver SBRT between September 2017 and September 2021. Data from pre-simulation motion management assessment using fluoroscopic assessment of liver dome position in repeat breath holds, and motion with and without AC, was reviewed to determine liver dome position consistency in EBH and the impact of AC on motion. Treatment time was assessed for all fractions as time from first image acquisition to last treatment beam off.

Results:

Of 136 patients treated with 145 courses of liver SBRT, 68 % were treated in EBH, 20 % with AC, 7 % in gating and 5 % in FB. AC resulted in motion reduction < 1 mm in 9/26 patients assessed. Median treatment time was higher using EBH (39 min) or gating (42 min) compared with AC (30 min) or FB (24 min) treatments.

Conclusions:

Motion management in liver SBRT needs to be assessed per-patient to ensure appropriate techniques are applied. Motion management significantly impacts treatment time therefore patient comfort must also be taken into account when selecting the technique for each patient.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article