Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interventions, outcomes and outcome measurement instruments in stillbirth care research: A systematic review to inform the development of a core outcome set.
Bakhbakhi, Danya; Siassakos, Dimitrios; Davies, Anna; Merriel, Abi; Barnard, Katie; Stead, Emma; Shakespeare, Clare; Duffy, James M N; Hinton, Lisa; McDowell, Karolina; Lyons, Anna; Fraser, Abigail; Burden, Christy.
Afiliação
  • Bakhbakhi D; University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Siassakos D; Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Davies A; Centre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Merriel A; University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Barnard K; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Stead E; Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Shakespeare C; University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Duffy JMN; North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Hinton L; THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • McDowell K; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Lyons A; Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
  • Fraser A; University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Burden C; University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BJOG ; 130(6): 560-576, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36655361
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A core outcome set could address inconsistent outcome reporting and improve evidence for stillbirth care research, which have been identified as an important research priority.

OBJECTIVES:

To identify outcomes and outcome measurement instruments reported by studies evaluating interventions after the diagnosis of a stillbirth. SEARCH STRATEGY Amed, BNI, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and WHO ICTRP from 1998 to August 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised and non-randomised comparative or non-comparative studies reporting a stillbirth care intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND

ANALYSIS:

Interventions, outcomes reported, definitions and outcome measurement tools were extracted. MAIN

RESULTS:

Forty randomised and 200 non-randomised studies were included. Fifty-eight different interventions were reported, labour and birth care (52 studies), hospital bereavement care (28 studies), clinical investigations (116 studies), care in a multiple pregnancy (2 studies), psychosocial support (28 studies) and care in a subsequent pregnancy (14 studies). A total of 391 unique outcomes were reported and organised into 14 outcome domains labour and birth; postpartum; delivery of care; investigations; multiple pregnancy; mental health; emotional functioning; grief and bereavement; social functioning; relationship; whole person; subsequent pregnancy; subsequent children and siblings and economic. A total of 242 outcome measurement instruments were used, with 0-22 tools per outcome.

CONCLUSIONS:

Heterogeneity in outcome reporting, outcome definition and measurement tools in care after stillbirth exists. Considerable research gaps on specific intervention types in stillbirth care were identified. A core outcome set is needed to standardise outcome collection and reporting for stillbirth care research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Natimorto / Sistemas de Apoio Psicossocial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Natimorto / Sistemas de Apoio Psicossocial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article