Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analytical performance of 17 commercially available point-of-care tests for CRP to support patient management at lower levels of the health system.
Calarco, Serafina; Fernandez-Carballo, B Leticia; Keller, Thomas; Weber, Stephan; Jakobi, Meike; Marsall, Patrick; Schneiderhan-Marra, Nicole; Dittrich, Sabine.
Afiliação
  • Calarco S; FIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Fernandez-Carballo BL; FIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Keller T; ACOMED Statistik, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Weber S; ACOMED Statistik, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Jakobi M; NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
  • Marsall P; NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
  • Schneiderhan-Marra N; NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
  • Dittrich S; FIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
PLoS One ; 18(1): e0267516, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36662693
Accurate and precise point-of-care (POC) testing for C-reactive protein (CRP) can help support healthcare providers in the clinical management of patients. Here, we compared the analytical performance of 17 commercially available POC CRP tests to enable more decentralized use of the tool. The following CRP tests were evaluated. Eight quantitative tests: QuikRead go (Aidian), INCLIX (Sugentech), Spinit (Biosurfit), LS4000 (Lansionbio), GS 1200 (Gensure Biotech), Standard F200 (SD Biosensor), Epithod 616 (DxGen), IFP-3000 (Xincheng Biological); and nine semi-quantitative tests: Actim CRP (ACTIM), NADAL Dipstick (nal von minden), NADAL cassette (nal von minden), ALLTEST Dipstick (Hangzhou Alltest Biotech), ALLTEST Cassette cut-off 10-40-80 (Hangzhou Alltest Biotech), ALLTEST Cassette cut-off 10-30 (Hangzhou Alltest Biotech), Biotest (Hangzhou Biotest Biotech), BTNX Quad Line (BTNX), BTNX Tri Line (BTNX). Stored samples (n = 660) had previously been tested for CRP using Cobas 8000 Modular analyzer (Roche Diagnostics International AG, Rotkreuz, Switzerland (reference standards). CRP values represented the clinically relevant range (10-100 mg/L) and were grouped into four categories (<10 mg/L, 10-40 mg/L or 10-30 mg/L, 40-80 mg/L or 30-80 mg/L, and > 80mg/L) for majority of the semi-quantitative tests. Among the eight quantitative POC tests evaluated, QuikRead go and Spinit exhibited better agreement with the reference method, showing slopes of 0.963 and 0.921, respectively. Semi-quantitative tests with the four categories showed a poor percentage agreement for the intermediate categories and higher percentage agreement for the lower and upper limit categories. Analytical performance varied considerably for the semi-quantitative tests, especially among the different categories of CRP values. Our findings suggest that quantitative tests might represent the best choice for a variety of use cases, as they can be used across a broad range of CRP categories.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteína C-Reativa / Testes Imediatos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteína C-Reativa / Testes Imediatos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article