Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interhospital Variability in Utilization of Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department.
Mazzella, Anthony J; Hendrickson, Michael J; Glorioso, Thomas J; Sherwood, Dalton; Essig, Jeremiah; Grunwald, Gary; Rosman, Lindsey; Gehi, Anil K.
Afiliação
  • Mazzella AJ; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Hendrickson MJ; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Glorioso TJ; Veterans Health Administration Office of Quality and Patient Safety, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington DC.
  • Sherwood D; University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Essig J; University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Grunwald G; Veterans Health Administration Office of Quality and Patient Safety, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington DC; Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado.
  • Rosman L; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Gehi AK; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: anil_gehi@med.unc.edu.
Am J Cardiol ; 191: 101-109, 2023 03 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36669379
ABSTRACT
The role for direct current cardioversion (DCCV) in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the emergency department (ED) is unclear. Factors associated with DCCV in current practice are not well described, nor is the variation across patients and institutions. All ED encounters with a primary diagnosis of AF were identified from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample from 2006 to 2017. The independent association of patient and hospital factors with use of DCCV was assessed using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression. The relative contributions of patient, hospital, and unmeasured hospital factors were assessed using reference effect measures methods. Among 1,280,914 visits to 3,264 EDs with primary diagnosis of AF, 31,422 patients (2.4%) underwent DCCV in the ED. History of stroke (odds ratio [OR] 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 0.22, p <0.001) and dementia (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.19, p <0.001) was associated with lowest odds of DCCV. Comparing patients more likely to receive DCCV (ninety-fifth percentile) with patients with median risk, the influence of unmeasured hospital factors (OR 14.13, 95% CI 12.55 to 16.09) exceeded the contributions of patient (OR 5.66, 95% CI 5.28 to 6.15) and measured hospital factors (OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.87 to 5.60). In conclusion, DCCV use in the ED varied widely across institutions. Disproportionately large unmeasured hospital variation suggests that presenting hospital is the most determinative factor in the use of DCCV for ED management of AF. Clarification is needed on best practices for management of AF in the ED, including the use of DCCV.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article