Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women.
Rawashdeh, Hasan; Aljalodi, Haneen; Shamleh, Rafeef Abu; Alshorman, Sumyah; AboShindi, Heba; Awawdeh, Shatha.
Afiliação
  • Rawashdeh H; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan. hmrawashdeh@just.edu.jo.
  • Aljalodi H; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan.
  • Shamleh RA; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan.
  • Alshorman S; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, King Abdulla University Hospital, Ar-Ramtha, Jordan.
  • AboShindi H; USAID Health Services Quality Accelerator Activity / University Research Co., Amman, Jordan.
  • Awawdeh S; King Abdullah II School for Information Technology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 49, 2023 Jan 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36670392
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To validate both models of Grobman nomogram (The antenatal and the intrapartum model) for predicting successful intended Vaginal Birth After Caesarean delivery (VBAC) in a Jordanian population.

METHODS:

A retrospective study has identified all live, singleton, term, cephalic pregnancies with a previous lower segment cesarean section who opted for a Trial Of Labour After Caesarean Section (TOLAC) between January 2014 to December 2020. Five variables were used for the antenatal model, while ten variables were used for the intrapartum model. Two sets of patients were created one for the antenatal model and the other for the intrapartum model. The predicted probability for each woman was calculated and compared with the successful VBAC for each category. The predictive ability was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic, and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined.

RESULTS:

There were seven hundred and fourteen complete cases for the antenatal model and six hundred ninety-seven for the intrapartum model. Our population's overall number of VBAC is 83.89% for the antenatal group and 82.92% for the intrapartum group. The mean predicted probability for a successful intended VBAC using the antenatal and intrapartum models were 79.53 ± 13.47 and 78.64 ± 14.03, respectively. The antenatal and intrapartum predictive models ROC had an AUC of 65% (95% CI 60%-71%) and 64% (95% CI 58%-69%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both models are validated in the Jordanian population. Adapting the antenatal model as supporting evidence can lead to a higher rate of TOLAC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cesárea / Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cesárea / Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article