Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data.
Zaslansky, Ruth; Baumbach, Philipp; Edry, Ruth; Chetty, Sean; Min, Lim Siu; Schaub, Isabelle; Cruz, Jorge Jimenez; Meissner, Winfried; Stamer, Ulrike M.
Afiliação
  • Zaslansky R; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Baumbach P; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Edry R; Acute Pain Service, Department of Anesthesiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 3109601, Israel.
  • Chetty S; Department of Anaesthesiology& Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7500, South Africa.
  • Min LS; Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
  • Schaub I; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Clinic, Clinique St Jean, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
  • Cruz JJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bonn University Hospital, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
  • Meissner W; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany.
  • Stamer UM; Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
J Clin Med ; 12(2)2023 Jan 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36675605
ABSTRACT
Women who have had a Cesarean Section (CS) frequently report severe pain and pain-related interference. One reason for insufficient pain treatment might be inconsistent implementation of evidence-based guidelines. We assessed the association between implementing three elements of care recommended by guidelines for postoperative pain management and pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in women after CS. The analysis relied on an anonymized dataset of women undergoing CS, retrieved from PAIN OUT. PAIN OUT, an international perioperative pain registry, provides clinicians with treatment assessment methodology and tools for patients to assess multi-dimensional pain-related PROs on the first postoperative day. We examined whether the care included [i] regional anesthesia with a neuraxial opioid OR general anesthesia with wound infiltration or a Transvesus Abdominis Plane block; [ii] at least one non-opioid analgesic at the full daily dose; and [iii] pain assessment and recording. Credit for care was given only if all three elements were administered (= "full"); otherwise, it was "incomplete". A "Pain Composite Score-total" (PCStotal), evaluating outcomes of pain intensity, pain-related interference with function, and side-effects, was the primary endpoint in the total cohort (women receiving GA and/or RA) or a sub-group of women with RA only. Data from 5182 women was analyzed. "Full" care was administered to 20% of women in the total cohort and to 21% in the RA sub-group. In both groups, the PCStotal was significantly lower compared to "incomplete" care (p < 0.001); this was a small-to-moderate effect size. Administering all three elements of care was associated with better pain-related outcomes after CS. These should be straightforward and inexpensive for integration into routine care after CS. However, even in this group, a high proportion of women reported poor outcomes, indicating that additional work needs to be carried out to close the evidence-practice gap so that women who have undergone CS can be comfortable when caring for themselves and their newborn.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article