Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Chagas VirClia® and Chagas TESA VirClia® for the Diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi Infection.
García-Bermejo, Isabel; Arana, David Molina; Zaragoza Vargas, Gloria; Carrasco Fernández, Blanca; García, Emilia; Nieto, Javier; Flores-Chávez, Maria Delmans.
Afiliação
  • García-Bermejo I; Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, 28905 Madrid, Spain.
  • Arana DM; Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, 28905 Madrid, Spain.
  • Zaragoza Vargas G; Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, 28905 Madrid, Spain.
  • Carrasco Fernández B; Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, 28905 Madrid, Spain.
  • García E; Leishmaniasis and Chagas Disease Unit, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Madrid, Spain.
  • Nieto J; Leishmaniasis and Chagas Disease Unit, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Madrid, Spain.
  • Flores-Chávez MD; Leishmaniasis and Chagas Disease Unit, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Madrid, Spain.
Pathogens ; 12(1)2022 Dec 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36678398
ABSTRACT
Chagas disease (CD), caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, is an important problem of public health even in regions where it is not endemic. Spain ranks second worldwide in terms of imported cases of T. cruzi infection in the chronic phase. The diagnosis in this stage is made via the detection of antibodies against T. cruzi. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of two fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassays, Chagas VirClia® (CHR), which uses a mixture of recombinant antigens, and Chagas TESA VirClia® (TESA), the first chemiluminescence assay based on excretion-secretion antigens of trypomastigotes, both designed in monotest format. A retrospective case-control study was performed using 105 well-characterized samples 49 from patients with CD, 22 from uninfected individuals, and 32 from patients with other pathologies. Sensitivity was 98% for CHR and 92% for TESA. In contrast, the specificity in both was 100%. Cross-reactivity was observed in leishmaniasis (2/10). CHR meets the criteria to become a tool for serological screening, while TESA has the potential for confirmation and cross-reaction discrimination. The monotest format allows its application in laboratories with a small number of samples. The high specificity of both assays is useful in areas where leishmaniasis is endemic.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article