Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
First Analysis of Nationwide Trends in the Use of the SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework.
Puma, Jini E; Quinlan, Jennie; Bruno, Pamela; Keller, Kimberly; Franck, Karen; Lim, Sue Sing; Draper, Carrie; Bergling, Emily; Foerster, Susan.
Afiliação
  • Puma JE; Rocky Mountain Prevention Research Center, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO. Electronic address: jini.puma@cuanschutz.edu.
  • Quinlan J; Rocky Mountain Prevention Research Center, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO.
  • Bruno P; Center for Excellence in Public Health, University of New England, Portland, ME.
  • Keller K; Department of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
  • Franck K; Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
  • Lim SS; Department of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
  • Draper C; Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
  • Bergling E; Rocky Mountain Prevention Research Center, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO.
  • Foerster S; Network for a Healthy California, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA.
J Nutr Educ Behav ; 55(3): 235-244, 2023 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36707326
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To understand Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) Implementing Agencies'(SIAs) use of the SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework (Framework), which is a tool that includes 51 indicators that SNAP-Ed programs can use to measure the success of their programs in the first 5 years after its release.

METHODS:

A repeated cross-sectional study design was utilized to administer electronic surveys to between 124 and 154 SIAs who received SNAP-Ed funding in fiscal years 2017, 2019, and 2021. Analyses included descriptive statistics and tests of proportions.

RESULTS:

Most SIAs indicated that they used the Framework to inform both data collection instruments and program planning decisions and the rates remained relatively constant over the 3 time points (> 80%). The most common specific use of the Framework across all 3 time points was to define, count, or measure the work accomplished, but this statistically decreased from 2017 (76%) to 2021 (57%) (z-score = 3.31; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The results of this analysis confirmed that 5 years after its introduction, uptake and use of the Framework was high and that, as a whole, SIAs focused on priority indicators set by the US Department of Agriculture, with no notable increases in addressing and measuring longer-term, multisector, and population-wide outcomes. The systematic study of the Framework's usability over time has a broader application to other national health promotion initiatives with shared frameworks.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Alimentar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Alimentar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article