Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sex-specific differences in the standard of care for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and death.
Pouncey, Anna L; Sweeting, Michael J; Bicknell, Colin; Powell, Janet T.
Afiliação
  • Pouncey AL; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Sweeting MJ; Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Bicknell C; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Powell JT; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Br J Surg ; 110(4): 481-488, 2023 03 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36722039
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study investigated whether sex-specific differences in preoperative/perioperative standard of care (SOC) account for disparity in outcomes after elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective cohort study of elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (2013-2020) using depersonalized patient-level National Vascular Registry data. SOC was defined for waiting times, preoperative assessment (multidisciplinary/anaesthetic review), cardiovascular risk prevention, and perioperative medication. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular event and/or death (MACED).

RESULTS:

Some 21 810 patients with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were included, 2380 women and 19 430 men. Women less often underwent aneurysm repair within SOC waiting times (51.5 versus 59.3 per cent; P < 0.001), but were equally likely to receive preoperative assessment (72.1 versus 72.5 per cent; P = 0.742). Women were less likely to receive secondary prevention for known cardiac disease (34.9 versus 39.6 per cent; P = 0.015), but more often met overall cardiovascular risk prevention standards (52.1 versus 47.3 per cent; P < 0.001). Women were at greater risk of MACED (open 12.0 versus 8.9 per cent, P < 0.001; endovascular 4.9 versus 2.9 per cent, P < 0.001; risk-adjusted OR 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.12 to 1.59). A significant reduction in the odds of MACED was associated with preoperative assessment (OR 0.86, 0.75 to 0.98) and SOC waiting times (OR 0.78, 0.69 to 0.87). There was insufficient evidence to confirm a significant sex-specific difference in the effect of SOC preoperative assessment (women OR 0.69, 0.50 to 0.97; men OR 0.89, 0.77 to 1.03; interaction P = 0.170) or SOC waiting times (women OR 0.84, 0.62 to 1.16; men OR 0.76, 0.67 to 0.87; interaction P = 0.570) on the risk of MACED.

CONCLUSION:

SOC waiting times and preoperative assessment were not met for both sexes, which was associated with an increased risk of MACED. Sex-specific differences in SOC attenuated but did not fully account for the increased risk of MACED in women.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article