Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recommendations on the use of item libraries for patient-reported outcome measurement in oncology trials: findings from an international, multidisciplinary working group.
Piccinin, Claire; Basch, Ethan; Bhatnagar, Vishal; Calvert, Melanie; Campbell, Alicyn; Cella, David; Cleeland, Charles S; Coens, Corneel; Darlington, Anne-Sophie; Dueck, Amylou C; Groenvold, Mogens; Herold, Ralf; King-Kallimanis, Bellinda L; Kluetz, Paul G; Kulis, Dagmara; O'Connor, Daniel; Oliver, Kathy; Pe, Madeline; Reeve, Bryce B; Reijneveld, Jaap C; Wang, Xin Shelley; Bottomley, Andrew.
Afiliação
  • Piccinin C; Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: claire.piccinin@eort.org.
  • Basch E; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Bhatnagar V; Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Calvert M; Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Bir
  • Campbell A; Digital Health Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • Cella D; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
  • Cleeland CS; Department of Symptom Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Coens C; Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Darlington AS; School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Dueck AC; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
  • Groenvold M; Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Herold R; European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • King-Kallimanis BL; LUNGevity Foundation, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Kluetz PG; Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Kulis D; Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • O'Connor D; Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
  • Oliver K; International Brain Tumour Alliance, Tadworth, UK.
  • Pe M; Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Reeve BB; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Reijneveld JC; Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Wang XS; Department of Symptom Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Bottomley A; Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Lancet Oncol ; 24(2): e86-e95, 2023 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36725153
ABSTRACT
The use of item libraries for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement in oncology allows for the customisation of PRO assessment to measure key health-related quality of life concepts of relevance to the target population and intervention. However, no high-level recommendations exist to guide users on the design and implementation of these customised PRO measures (item lists) across different PRO measurement systems. To address this issue, a working group was set up, including international stakeholders (academic, independent, industry, health technology assessment, regulatory, and patient advocacy), with the goal of creating recommendations for the use of item libraries in oncology trials. A scoping review was carried out to identify relevant publications and highlight any gaps. Stakeholders commented on the available guidance for each research question, proposed recommendations on how to address gaps in the literature, and came to an agreement using discussion-based methods. Nine primary research questions were identified that formed the scope and structure of the recommendations on how to select items and implement item lists created from item libraries. These recommendations address methods to drive item selection, plan the structure and analysis of item lists, and facilitate their use in conjunction with other measures. The findings resulted in high-level, instrument-agnostic recommendations on the use of item-library-derived item lists in oncology trials.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article