Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reverberant magnetic resonance elastographic imaging using a single mechanical driver.
Kabir, Irteza Enan; Caban-Rivera, Diego A; Ormachea, Juvenal; Parker, Kevin J; Johnson, Curtis L; Doyley, Marvin M.
Afiliação
  • Kabir IE; University of Rochester, Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences 1467, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
  • Caban-Rivera DA; University of Delaware, Department of Biomedical Engineering 19716, Newark, DE, United States of America.
  • Ormachea J; Verasonics, Inc., 11335 NE 122nd Way, Suite 100 98034 Kirkland, WA, United States of America.
  • Parker KJ; University of Rochester, Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences 1467, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
  • Johnson CL; University of Delaware, Department of Biomedical Engineering 19716, Newark, DE, United States of America.
  • Doyley MM; University of Rochester, Hajim School of Engineering and Applied Sciences 1467, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Phys Med Biol ; 68(5)2023 02 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36780698
ABSTRACT
Reverberant elastography provides fast and robust estimates of shear modulus; however, its reliance on multiple mechanical drivers hampers clinical utility. In this work, we hypothesize that for constrained organs such as the brain, reverberant elastography can produce accurate magnetic resonance elastograms with a single mechanical driver. To corroborate this hypothesis, we performed studies on healthy volunteers (n= 3); and a constrained calibrated brain phantom containing spherical inclusions with diameters ranging from 4-18 mm. In both studies (i.e. phantom and clinical), imaging was performed at frequencies of 50 and 70 Hz. We used the accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio performance metrics to evaluate reverberant elastograms relative to those computed using the established subzone inversion method. Errors incurred in reverberant elastograms varied from 1.3% to 16.6% when imaging at 50 Hz and 3.1% and 16.8% when imaging at 70 Hz. In contrast, errors incurred in subzone elastograms ranged from 1.9% to 13% at 50 Hz and 3.6% to 14.9% at 70 Hz. The contrast-to-noise ratio of reverberant elastograms ranged from 63.1 to 73 dB compared to 65 to 66.2 dB for subzone elastograms. The average global brain shear modulus estimated from reverberant and subzone elastograms was 2.36 ± 0.07 kPa and 2.38 ± 0.11 kPa, respectively, when imaging at 50 Hz and 2.70 ± 0.20 kPa and 2.89 ± 0.60 kPa respectively, when imaging at 70 Hz. The results of this investigation demonstrate that reverberant elastography can produce accurate, high-quality elastograms of the brain with a single mechanical driver.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article