Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pain inhibition-the unintended benefit of electrically elicited muscle strengthening contractions.
Rudolph, Katherine S; Cloutier, Matthew; Stackhouse, Scott.
Afiliação
  • Rudolph KS; Department of Physical Therapy, University of New England, 716 Stevens Ave., Portland, ME, 04103, USA. krudolph@une.edu.
  • Cloutier M; College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach Road, Biddeford, ME, 04005, USA.
  • Stackhouse S; Department of Physical Therapy, University of New England, 716 Stevens Ave., Portland, ME, 04103, USA.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 131, 2023 Feb 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36803339
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is effective in muscle strengthening after orthopedic injury particularly when muscle activation failure is present, but the associated pain can be a barrier. Pain itself can produce a pain inhibitory response called Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). CPM is often used in research studies to assess the state of the pain processing system. However, the inhibitory response of CPM could make NMES more tolerable to patients and could improve functional outcomes in people with pain. This study compares the pain-inhibitory effect of NMES compared to volitional contractions and noxious electrical stimulation (NxES).

METHODS:

Healthy participants, 18-30 years of age experienced 3 conditions 10 NMES contractions, 10 bursts of NxES on the patella, and 10 volitional contractions on the right knee. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were measured before and after each condition in both knees and the middle finger. Pain was reported on an 11-point VAS. Repeated measures ANOVAs with 2 factors site and time were performed for each condition followed by post-hoc paired t-tests, with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS:

Pain ratings were higher in the NxES condition compared to NMES (p = .000). No differences in PPTs prior to each condition were observed but PPTs were significantly higher in the right and left knees after the NMES contractions (p = .000, p = .013, respectively) and after the NxES (p = .006, P-.006, respectively). Pain during NMES and NxES did not correlate with pain inhibition (p > .05). Self-reported pain sensitivity correlated with pain during NxES.

CONCLUSION:

NxES and NMES produced higher PPTs in both knees but not in the finger, suggesting that the mechanisms responsible for the reduction in pain are located in the spinal cord and local tissues. Pain reduction was elicited during the NxES and NMES conditions regardless of the self-reported pain ratings. When NMES is used for muscle strengthening significant pain reduction can also occur, which is an unintended benefit of the intervention that could improve functional outcomes in patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica / Contração Muscular Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica / Contração Muscular Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article