Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implant survival in the anterior mandible: A retrospective cohort study.
Pedrinaci, Ignacio; Sun, Teresa Chanting; Sanz-Alonso, Mariano; Sanz-Esporrin, Javier; Hamilton, Adam; Gallucci, German O.
Afiliação
  • Pedrinaci I; Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Sun TC; Section of Graduate Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sanz-Alonso M; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, National Defense Medical Center and Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Sanz-Esporrin J; Department of Periodontology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Hamilton A; Section of Graduate Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
  • Gallucci GO; ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases) Research Group, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 34(5): 463-474, 2023 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36806171
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to report the implant survival rate of dental implants of partially dentate patients in the anterior mandible and the potential risk indicators for implant failure. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients with implant-supported restorations of single or multiple teeth in the anterior mandible restored with fixed partial implant-supported restorations were evaluated. Patient demographic data, implant placement timing, and loading protocol, biological and/or technical complications at the time of the last clinical and radiographic follow-up visit were registered. Survival rate, success rate, and potential risk indicators for implant failure were calculated.

RESULTS:

A total of 108 patients and 186 implants with a mean follow-up period of 5.48 years (0.1-11.34 years) were included. The 11.3-year cumulative survival rate was 90.9%. Immediate implant placement (OR = 2.75) (p = .08) and immediate implant loading (OR = 8.8) (p = .02*) indicated a higher risk of failure than late implant placement or loading. When combining both categories (type 1A), an OR = 10.59 (p = .04*) for implant failure was found compared to category 4C. Implants placed following static-computer-assisted implant surgery (S-CAIS) showed less risk of failure compared to freehand implant placement (OR = 0.18; 95% CI 0.02-1.37) (p = .09).

CONCLUSIONS:

The survival rate of implants placed in the anterior mandible was considerably low (90.9%). S-CAIS, late placement, and conventional loading are protective factor against implant failure in the anterior mandible.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article