Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nodules Identified on Surveillance Ultrasound for HCC: CEUS or MRI as the Initial Test?
Hu, Jinghui; Burrowes, David P; Caine, Benjamin A; Gibson, Nicolas; Bhayana, Deepak; Medellin, Alexandra; Burak, Kelly W; Wilson, Stephanie R.
Afiliação
  • Hu J; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Burrowes DP; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Caine BA; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Gibson N; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Bhayana D; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Medellin A; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Burak KW; Medicine and Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Wilson SR; Radiology and Medicine, Division of Gastroentrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Ultrasound Med ; 42(6): 1181-1190, 2023 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36807925
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Following positive surveillance ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for further characterization. We propose contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) shows equivalent efficacy.

METHODS:

This prospective institutional review board approved study recruited 195 consecutive at-risk patients with a positive surveillance US. All had CEUS and MRI. Biopsy (n = 44) and follow-up are gold standard. MRI and CEUS results are classified according to liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) and patient outcome.

RESULTS:

As an US-based modality, CEUS is superior in confirming findings from surveillance US, correlation in 189/195 (97%) on CEUS compared to 153/195 (79%) on MRI. Within these negative MRI examinations, there are 2 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 1 cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) diagnosed on CEUS and proven by biopsy. From 195 patients, there are 71 malignant diagnoses from all sources, including 58 LR-5 (45 on MRI and 54 on CEUS) and 13 others, including HCC outside of LR-5 category, and LR-M with biopsy proven iCCA (3 on MRI and 6 on CEUS). CEUS and MRI show concordant results in the majority of patients (146/195, 75%), including 57/146 malignant and 89/146 benign diagnoses. There are 41/57 concordant LR-5 and 6/57 concordant LR-M. When CEUS and MRI are discordant, CEUS upgraded 20 (10 biopsy-proven) from MRI LR-3/4 to CEUS LR-5 or LR-M by showing washout (WO) that MRI failed to show. Additionally, CEUS characterized time and intensity of WO and diagnosed 13/20 LR-5 by showing late and weak WO and 7 LR-M by showing fast and marked WO. CEUS is 81% sensitive and 92% specific in diagnosing malignancy. MRI is 64% sensitive and 93% specific.

CONCLUSIONS:

CEUS performance is at least equivalent if not superior to MRI for initial evaluation of lesions from surveillance US.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article