Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Language Disparity Predicts Poor Patient-Reported Outcome and Follow-Up in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.
Wang, Fei; Rothchild, Evan; Lu, Yi-Hsueh; Ricci, Joseph A.
Afiliação
  • Wang F; The Division of Plastic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Rothchild E; The Division of Plastic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Lu YH; The Division of Plastic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Ricci JA; The Division of Plastic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 39(9): 681-694, 2023 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36809784
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) have starkly different health care experiences compared with their English-proficient counterparts. The authors aim to examine the link between LEP and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction.

METHODS:

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent abdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction at our institution between 2009 and 2019 was performed. Variables collected included patient demographics, language status, interpreter usage, perioperative complications, follow-up visits, and self-reported outcomes (Breast-Q). Pearson's χ 2 test, Student's t-test, odds ratio analysis, and regression modeling were used for analysis.

RESULTS:

A total of 405 patients were included. LEP patients comprised 22.22% of the overall cohort with 80% of LEP patients utilizing interpreter services. LEP patients reported significantly lower satisfaction with an abdominal appearance at the 6-month follow-up and lower physical and sexual well-being scores at the 1-year follow-up (p = 0.05, 0.02, 0.01, respectively). Non-LEP patients had significantly longer operative times (539.6 vs. 499.3 minutes, p = 0.024), were more likely to have postoperative donor site revisions (p = 0.05), and more likely to receive preoperative neuraxial anesthesia (p = 0.01). After adjusting for confounders, LEP stats was associated with 0.93 fewer follow-up visits (p = 0.02). Interestingly, compared with LEP patients who did not receive interpreter services, LEP patients who did had 1.98 more follow-up visits (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in emergency room visits or complications between the cohorts.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings suggest that language disparities exist within microsurgical breast reconstruction and underscore the importance of effective, language-conscious communication between surgeon and patient.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Barreiras de Comunicação / Idioma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Barreiras de Comunicação / Idioma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article