Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prioritizing rural populations in state comprehensive cancer control plans: a qualitative assessment.
Hirschey, Rachel; Rohweder, Catherine; Zahnd, Whitney E; Eberth, Jan M; Adsul, Prajakta; Guan, Yue; Yeager, Katherine A; Haines, Heidi; Farris, Paige E; Bea, Jennifer W; Dwyer, Andrea; Madhivanan, Purnima; Ranganathan, Radhika; Seaman, Aaron T; Vu, Thuy; Wickersham, Karen; Vu, Maihan; Teal, Randall; Giannone, Kara; Hilton, Alison; Cole, Allison; Islam, Jessica Y; Askelson, Natoshia.
Afiliação
  • Hirschey R; School of Nursing, UNC Chapel Hill, and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. rachel@hirschey.org.
  • Rohweder C; Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Zahnd WE; Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Eberth JM; Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Adsul P; Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico & University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
  • Guan Y; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Yeager KA; Nell Hodgson School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Haines H; Prevention Research Center for Rural Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Farris PE; Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Bea JW; Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel & Enid Zuckerman, College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Dwyer A; Community and Behavioral Health, The Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Madhivanan P; University of Arizona Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Ranganathan R; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Seaman AT; Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Vu T; MPH Health Promotion Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Wickersham K; College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Vu M; UNC CHAI Core, Connected Health Applications & Interventions (CHAI) Core, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Teal R; UNC CHAI Core, Connected Health Applications & Interventions (CHAI) Core, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Giannone K; UNC CHAI Core, Connected Health Applications & Interventions (CHAI) Core, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Hilton A; UNC CHAI Core, Connected Health Applications & Interventions (CHAI) Core, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Cole A; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Islam JY; Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Askelson N; Department of Community & Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Cancer Causes Control ; 34(Suppl 1): 159-169, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36840904
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP) requires that states develop comprehensive cancer control (CCC) plans and recommends that disparities related to rural residence are addressed in these plans. The objective of this study was to explore rural partner engagement and describe effective strategies for incorporating a rural focus in CCC plans.

METHODS:

States were selected for inclusion using stratified sampling based on state rurality and region. State cancer control leaders were interviewed about facilitators and barriers to engaging rural partners and strategies for prioritizing rural populations. Content analysis was conducted to identify themes across states.

RESULTS:

Interviews (n = 30) revealed themes in three domains related to rural inclusion in CCC plans. The first domain (barriers) included (1) designing CCC plans to be broad, (2) defining "rural populations," and (3) geographic distance. The second domain (successful strategies) included (1) collaborating with rural healthcare systems, (2) recruiting rural constituents, (3) leveraging rural community-academic partnerships, and (4) working jointly with Native nations. The third domain (strategies for future plan development) included (1) building relationships with rural communities, (2) engaging rural constituents in planning, (3) developing a better understanding of rural needs, and (4) considering resources for addressing rural disparities.

CONCLUSION:

Significant relationship building with rural communities, resource provision, and successful strategies used by others may improve inclusion of rural needs in state comprehensive cancer control plans and ultimately help plan developers directly address rural cancer health disparities.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article